Your message dated Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:18:51 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#986111: fixed in lintian-brush 0.104 has caused the Debian Bug report #986111, regarding lintian-brush: FTBFS when vendor!=Debian to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 986111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: lintian-brush Version: 0.102 Severity: important Hello, the package FTBFS in Ubuntu, I think because if_vendor and vendor are one Ubuntu and the other Debian fixer sanity test: public-upstream-key-in-native-package ... ok fixer sanity test: pubkey ... ok fixer test: last for debian-rules-uses-as-needed-linker-flag ... ok fixer test: split for debian-rules-uses-as-needed-linker-flag ... ok fixer test: simple for debian-rules-uses-as-needed-linker-flag ... ok fixer sanity test: debian-rules-uses-as-needed-linker-flag ... ok fixer test: simple for debian-rules-uses-special-shell-variable ... ok fixer sanity test: debian-rules-uses-special-shell-variable ... ok fixer test: simple for debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog ... ok fixer sanity test: debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog ... ok fixer test: source for field-name-typo-in-control ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/fixers/field-name-typo-in-control.py", line 10, in <module> valid_field_names.update(known_source_fields(vendor())) File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lintian_brush/lintian.py", line 101, in known_source_fields return _read_test_fields(KNOWN_SOURCE_FIELDS_PATH, vendor) File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lintian_brush/lintian.py", line 84, in _read_test_fields fields = list(read_list_file(f, vendor=vendor)) File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lintian_brush/lintian.py", line 54, in read_list_file raise ValueError('invalid check %r' % cond) ValueError: invalid check '@if-vendor-is-not' FAIL fixer sanity test: field-name-typo-in-control ... ok ====================================================================== FAIL: fixer test: source for field-name-typo-in-control ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lintian_brush/tests/fixers.py", line 105, in runTest self.assertEqual(p.returncode, 0) AssertionError: 1 != 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 762 tests in 73.065s FAILED (failures=1, expected failures=1) Test failed: <unittest.runner.TextTestResult run=762 errors=0 failures=1> error: Test failed: <unittest.runner.TextTestResult run=762 errors=0 failures=1> E: pybuild pybuild:353: test: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: python3.9 setup.py test dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 Unfortunately I don't understand too much the code around to provide a good patch... https://launchpadlibrarian.net/530679036/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-amd64.lintian-brush_0.102_BUILDING.txt.gz I hope you can dig into the issue if possible thanks Gianfranco
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: lintian-brush Source-Version: 0.104 Done: Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lintian-brush, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [email protected], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> (supplier of updated lintian-brush package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:56:27 +0100 Source: lintian-brush Architecture: source Version: 0.104 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> Closes: 986111 Changes: lintian-brush (0.104) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix parsing of @if-vendor-is-not in lintian lists files. Closes: #986111 * debian-watch-file-uses-old-github-pattern: Also update watch files that uses the 'releases' page. Checksums-Sha1: 9e646b0d8c0e0655e25bdadee8538927b7ae0f25 2316 lintian-brush_0.104.dsc df4a988bedf2639ec65c0b2364becbc7633d9fe5 913236 lintian-brush_0.104.tar.xz f12ebafc60774e4c1665b728eb0b5b3dca04c413 12827 lintian-brush_0.104_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: f30a87df726712610ab1706500c5d127c6ac08b7971c83bddf796be6fee2c52e 2316 lintian-brush_0.104.dsc 70007d06fa157d2bc569f8107f3a2036bcc315f9586d9a181a9d7cef0fd8ba9f 913236 lintian-brush_0.104.tar.xz 147f7cd2c072dea39c59a41c92594f148eb4cd1ff7c0080480e1ccf96a19a249 12827 lintian-brush_0.104_amd64.buildinfo Files: 6226e22d304c9fbec1d41b9a14da2163 2316 devel optional lintian-brush_0.104.dsc 9aaff088cca9287a9a457176b560ef66 913236 devel optional lintian-brush_0.104.tar.xz 4cf6797f9476fcbf06e5cead0dc99d51 12827 devel optional lintian-brush_0.104_amd64.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEsjhixBXWVlpOhsvXV5wWDUyeI+gFAmBiFqUACgkQV5wWDUye I+iC+hAApHL6UIElllKycSx9PoaKCIuksLzKeokR4MxAiSdXW+O1G8dwZqVv85Ol 5ibjNZv2oKZdEyQOb6u+XRR+En6MvXN2AJFSpBOS0nmb6oM3A+LCzRo8rQeF6SCw a8oBOApj1NQL9gtmkj+h9ustUMK4gjVjvR783Qru5Y865VRCarP612AQYtDOMu65 C4IOmEMfaPhNtEaBWVEtlgn3k2oBRRT2ym07yIbE/qNVt+otBkHpIosufpFrlZGd BAvMQVrXs3UcIfMh1SEbAFoAojvn1ijxG4XsJyXZaff6vk1gpTLQNMwrmC4i3euG 6XSBeQE6/2o+OLHDgvmVc2s1UjzNhqyqiOWJuRtGSVvw1+wqA9szIyCegQS+wVCr XzCt70SK/zxGebluX35QN+f/vwnO54jZjmGKmxhcfgDxF9V0vd2gavIRfVDbgRzn IiOaj6XEzBipnAsSuIPvn4hQ3I21ETKZT5nh2YH6dpa73p4pm+ixkf7qGK+00KRo 7I8k2hB4GyI6e7cyOSDaKq8heoAUehHwn/QKJKAFxgSFu5VHxgFn+q/M7taFSyRI Hqwct+emYPPZuMjE9LV03ROprMiovR0KqSbmwlq6lk0GgRk0OZ4nwnafE/K9bz5I vdzD1GPwY4u1WoK25voFCqzw6yIeh8b0dJW2UurxPJi4ns6Pbw0= =bKCY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
