Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:10:37 -0700
with message-id
<caou6tacaay_zrokdurxu6vxojs7-nmfpmokyxz59h0ut4mt...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Please enable numa support
has caused the Debian Bug report #861553,
regarding Please enable numa support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
861553: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mariadb-10.1
Version: 10.1.22-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Shouldn't mariadb be built with numa support?
I see that the mysql build in debian is doing so
Regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
(x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:10.5.5-1
The Numa support for MariaDB 10.5 was added in
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/commit/2039c2755d0c642718dcc8be852174205577542b
I don't know how to test Numa support/use, so I'll assume it just
works unless somebody reports otherwise.
Thus closing issue.
--- End Message ---
