Your message dated Mon, 4 Oct 2021 12:03:31 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#995588: RFS: rumur/2021.09.29-1 -- model checker for the Murphi language has caused the Debian Bug report #995588, regarding RFS: rumur/2021.09.29-1 -- model checker for the Murphi language to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 995588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995588 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur": * Package name : rumur Version : 2021.09.29-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]> * URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur * License : Unlicense * Vcs : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur.git Section : devel It builds those binary packages: rumur - model checker for the Murphi language To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rumur/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rumur/rumur_2021.09.29-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: rumur (2021.09.29-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. . * Update Standards-Version from 4.5.1 to 4.6.0.1. Regards, Matt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 09:15:08AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2021, at 16:37, Adam Borowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:26:19AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > >> * Package name : rumur > >> Version : 2021.09.29-1 > > > >> rumur (2021.09.29-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > > > E: rumur: python3-script-but-no-python3-dep usr/bin/rumur-run python3 > > Indeed. From the extended description of that error I had thought this > package perhaps qualified for the exemption described, but wasn’t sure how > to indicate this. The script lintian is complaining about is rumur-run, a > wrapper that orchestrates some common options to one of the binaries. > This script is not necessary for using the package. That is, someone > without Python can directly run the binary, spelling out all their > options. > > With the above in mind, do you think it’s acceptable to retain only a > Suggests for python3? OTOH maybe this package has been wrong from its > first release and should have always declared a Depends on python3? It's not a regression, so I've just uploaded as-is. I don't have an opinion about the Depends issue, thus I'll exercise my procrastination skills :) Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Tea -- not only women can brag about their cup size. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
--- End Message ---
