Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:35:15 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gcc-cross-support has been removed from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #940101,
regarding gcc-for-build: typo in package description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
940101: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-for-build
Version: 4.9.2-1~exp3
Severity: minor
The package description reads:
Ensures that there is a gcc binary that can create executable build
architecture binaries. No provitions are made about the build architecture
besides being executable.
"provitions" looks like a typo for "provisions", so at minimum this
should be corrected.
That said, I'm not sure that sentence entirely makes sense even after
fixing the typo: "provisions" doesn't feel like quite the right word,
and the structure of the sentence implies that the build architecture is
executable, which is nonsensical. I think this sentence could use a
rewrite by somebody who understands what it was intended to mean.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [[email protected]]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3+rm
Most functionality is now implemented in gcc-defaults.
See https://bugs.debian.org/984456 for details.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
