Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:45:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#968059: cmark: outdated manpage
has caused the Debian Bug report #968059,
regarding cmark: outdated manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
968059: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968059
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cmark
Version: 0.29.0-2~bpo10+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I tried to use the documented `--normalize` option. However, that
option has not existed since version 0.27, so my script failed.
I checked and this is still a problem in bullseye.
I went down the rabbit whole and long story short this is an upstream
problem. When they merged pull request #194, they did not update the
manpage.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages cmark depends on:
ii libc6 2.28-10
cmark recommends no packages.
cmark suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.30.0-1~exp1
Hi Russell,
Quoting Russell Hernandez Ruiz (2020-08-07 19:17:44)
> I tried to use the documented `--normalize` option. However, that
> option has not existed since version 0.27, so my script failed.
>
> I checked and this is still a problem in bullseye.
>
> I went down the rabbit whole and long story short this is an upstream
> problem. When they merged pull request #194, they did not update the
> manpage.
Thanks for reporting - and sorry for the late response.
Upstream changelog indicate that this issue was fixed in release v0.30,
and I just now (with Debian packaging of v0.30.2) confirmed that the
option is no longer mentioned in the manpage.
Closing accordingly.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
--- End Message ---
