Your message dated Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:38:02 -0500
with message-id <3080702.eskF4yjNPb@localhost>
and subject line Re: RM: fwupd-ARCH-signed-template -- ROM; moving to new
source package
has caused the Debian Bug report #998861,
regarding RM: fwupd-ARCH-signed-template -- ROM; moving to new source package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
998861: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998861
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hey folks,
This is a little complicated, sorry... :-/
In upstream fwupd, the EFI pieces have been moved to a new fwupd-efi
source package and we're ready to take that change in Debian. The new
fwupd-efi source package will now provide the
fwupd-ARCH-signed-template binary packages.
*However*, for added complication we also want to keep the fwupd
source package around. There's a new version coming which *won't*
produce the fwupd-ARCH-signed-template packages, but it's not going to
be buildable until we have fwupd-efi in the archive due to a build-dep
on it.
So: I'm hoping that removing those existing binary packages from
unstable will be enough to allow fwupd-efi into the archive. Does that
sound reasonable?
(Patch for dak signing-config coming soon)
Cheers,
--
Steve
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:50:22 +0000 Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hey folks,
>
> This is a little complicated, sorry... :-/
>
> In upstream fwupd, the EFI pieces have been moved to a new fwupd-efi
> source package and we're ready to take that change in Debian. The new
> fwupd-efi source package will now provide the
> fwupd-ARCH-signed-template binary packages.
>
> *However*, for added complication we also want to keep the fwupd
> source package around. There's a new version coming which *won't*
> produce the fwupd-ARCH-signed-template packages, but it's not going to
> be buildable until we have fwupd-efi in the archive due to a build-dep
> on it.
>
> So: I'm hoping that removing those existing binary packages from
> unstable will be enough to allow fwupd-efi into the archive. Does that
> sound reasonable?
>
> (Patch for dak signing-config coming soon)
It looks like this is all done now, so closing.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
