Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:15:00 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Please provide a backport for Wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #764301,
regarding Please provide a backport for Wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
764301: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764301
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libwebp
Version: 0.4.1-1.2+b1
Severity: wishlist
Hi! In order to do a proper Wheezy backport of Qt5 it would be really cool to
have the current version of libwebp as a backport too.
Thanks, Lisandro.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:34 -0800 Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Time to admit it, I'm never going to do this. Not opposed to someone else
> making an attempt. Note that the next webp release is going to break ABI
> compatibility.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that the original bug
reporter no longer needs a backport to debian 7.. :)
For the record, backports aren't limited to the maintainer (though it's
always good to check in with them first to make sure they're not opposed
to a backport or aren't planning their own backport).
--- End Message ---
