Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:57:38 +0200 with message-id <7b74660b-e7b4-a025-d8d2-868f665af...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1008518: nmu: libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1008518, regarding nmu: libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1008518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008518 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at 1:1.1.4-1 while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Jordan, On 28-03-2022 21:36, Jordan Justen wrote:On 28-03-2022 10:20, Jordan Justen wrote:nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "riscv64 arch is at 1:1.1.4-1 while others are at 1:1.1.4-1+b2"It may be obvious to you, but, so what? Why is that a problem and how does rebuilding on all architectures solve that?I want to install libxxf86vm packages, such as libxxf86vm1:riscv64 on amd64. When I try to install it on amd64, apt wants to remove many amd64 packages. I think the difference of 1:1.1.4-1 vs 1:1.1.4-1+b2 might be the cause, but I will admit that I am not certain.Right, multiarch.As far as building "all architecures" is concerned, I don't know if this is required. If there was a way to only build riscv64 libxxf86vm 1:1.1.4-1+b2 to match the other architectures, then I think that would work as well.Rebuilding on all architectures wouldn't help, as the other architectures would be bumped too, so we only want to rebuild ia64 and riscv64. Scheduled.The reportbug program only provided a single line comment, so I assumed I should keep the explanation short. I apologize if I didn't file the bug properly.No worries, we got there now. PaulOpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---