Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:58:44 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#892355: findutils on testing breaks fslint recursive
search
has caused the Debian Bug report #892355,
regarding findutils on testing breaks fslint recursive search
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
892355: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: findutils
Version: 4.6.0+git+20161106-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Upgrading findutils from stable to testing breaks the fslint-gui recursive
function to search duplicate files.
I tried to downgrade fslint from 2.44 to 2.42 and the bug persists.
When downgrading findutils from 4.6.0+git+20170828-2 to 4.6.0+git+20161106-2,
both fslint version still working again.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-6.1-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=es_ES.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages findutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.26-6
ii libselinux1 2.7-2
findutils recommends no packages.
Versions of packages findutils suggests:
ii locate 4.6.0+git+20170828-2
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2018-03-18 Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2018-03-18 "jEsuSdA 8)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > El 09/03/18 a las 19:23, Andreas Metzler escribió:
> >> thanks for the detailed description. Do you see the error without gui?
> >> I have just tried in vain:
> > Same result than you with your tests:
> [...]
> > Any ideas?
> It might require some special tree. - Do you see the error with the
> commandline version in the original tree where you found the error?
Closing the report due to age and irreproducibility.
cu Andreas
--- End Message ---
