Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2022 17:27:43 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1011078: chromium: arm64 package not available in 
bullseye-security
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011078,
regarding chromium: arm64 package not available in bullseye-security
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1011078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: chromium
Version: 101.0.4951.64-1~deb11u1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Dear Maintainer,

Chromium 101.0.4951.64-1~deb11u1 has been accepted for bullseye-security, and 
the package 
is present for the amd64 architecture. I think it has been built for arm64, but 
it has not 
yet appeared at 
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/main/c/chromium/ -- I know 
there's a lag between amd64 and arm64 builds, but I think this is longer than 
usual. 
Please let me know if there's a better place to report this kind of issue.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.3
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.104-linuxkit (SMP w/6 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_RANDSTRUCT
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

Versions of packages chromium depends on:
ii  chromium-common     101.0.4951.41-1~deb11u1
ii  libasound2          1.2.4-1.1
ii  libatk-bridge2.0-0  2.38.0-1
ii  libatk1.0-0         2.36.0-2
ii  libatomic1          10.2.1-6
ii  libatspi2.0-0       2.38.0-4
ii  libc6               2.31-13+deb11u3
ii  libcairo2           1.16.0-5
ii  libcups2            2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  libdbus-1-3         1.12.20-2
ii  libdrm2             2.4.104-1
ii  libevent-2.1-7      2.1.12-stable-1
ii  libexpat1           2.2.10-2+deb11u3
ii  libflac8            1.3.3-2+deb11u1
ii  libfontconfig1      2.13.1-4.2
ii  libfreetype6        2.10.4+dfsg-1
ii  libgbm1             20.3.5-1
ii  libgcc-s1           10.2.1-6
ii  libglib2.0-0        2.66.8-1
ii  libgtk-3-0          3.24.24-4+deb11u2
ii  libjpeg62-turbo     1:2.0.6-4
ii  libjsoncpp24        1.9.4-4
ii  liblcms2-2          2.12~rc1-2
ii  libminizip1         1.1-8+b1
ii  libnspr4            2:4.29-1
ii  libnss3             2:3.61-1+deb11u2
ii  libopenjp2-7        2.4.0-3
ii  libopus0            1.3.1-0.1
ii  libpango-1.0-0      1.46.2-3
ii  libpng16-16         1.6.37-3
ii  libpulse0           14.2-2
ii  libre2-9            20210201+dfsg-1
ii  libsnappy1v5        1.1.8-1
ii  libstdc++6          10.2.1-6
ii  libwebp6            0.6.1-2.1
ii  libwebpdemux2       0.6.1-2.1
ii  libwebpmux3         0.6.1-2.1
ii  libx11-6            2:1.7.2-1
ii  libxcb1             1.14-3
ii  libxcomposite1      1:0.4.5-1
ii  libxdamage1         1:1.1.5-2
ii  libxext6            2:1.3.3-1.1
ii  libxfixes3          1:5.0.3-2
ii  libxkbcommon0       1.0.3-2
ii  libxml2             2.9.10+dfsg-6.7+deb11u1
ii  libxrandr2          2:1.5.1-1
ii  libxslt1.1          1.1.34-4
ii  zlib1g              1:1.2.11.dfsg-2

Versions of packages chromium recommends:
ii  chromium-sandbox  101.0.4951.41-1~deb11u1

Versions of packages chromium suggests:
ii  chromium-driver  101.0.4951.41-1~deb11u1
ii  chromium-l10n    101.0.4951.41-1~deb11u1
pn  chromium-shell   <none>

Versions of packages chromium-common depends on:
ii  libc6       2.31-13+deb11u3
ii  libstdc++6  10.2.1-6
ii  libx11-6    2:1.7.2-1
ii  libxext6    2:1.3.3-1.1
ii  x11-utils   7.7+5
ii  xdg-utils   1.1.3-4.1
ii  zlib1g      1:1.2.11.dfsg-2

Versions of packages chromium-common recommends:
ii  chromium-sandbox       101.0.4951.41-1~deb11u1
ii  fonts-liberation       1:1.07.4-11
ii  libgl1-mesa-dri        20.3.5-1
ii  libu2f-udev            1.1.10-3
ii  notification-daemon    3.20.0-4
ii  system-config-printer  1.5.14-1
ii  upower                 0.99.11-2

Versions of packages chromium-driver depends on:
ii  libatomic1      10.2.1-6
ii  libc6           2.31-13+deb11u3
ii  libevent-2.1-7  2.1.12-stable-1
ii  libgcc-s1       10.2.1-6
ii  libglib2.0-0    2.66.8-1
ii  libminizip1     1.1-8+b1
ii  libnspr4        2:4.29-1
ii  libnss3         2:3.61-1+deb11u2
ii  libre2-9        20210201+dfsg-1
ii  libstdc++6      10.2.1-6
ii  libxcb1         1.14-3
ii  zlib1g          1:1.2.11.dfsg-2

Versions of packages chromium-sandbox depends on:
ii  libc6  2.31-13+deb11u3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 03:53:25PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> clone 1011078 -1
> retitle -1 chromium: i386 and armhf packages FTBFS in bullseye
> tags -1 bullseye ftbfs
> severity -1 serious
> thanks
> 
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 20:33:46 +0200
> Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Hi Andres,
> > 
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:36:38PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > On 5/16/22 11:35, Ben Steinberg wrote:  
> > > 
> > > Security Team, is there a way for me to get access to the logs for
> > > chromium's security builds by ssh'ing into a machine? Or some other
> > > way for me to view them?  
> > 
> > The build logs are not public but we can retrieve them. But in this
> > case from #debian-buildd:
> > 
> > [17:58] < carnil> Hi, can someone double check if chromium/arm64
> > build for bullseye-security is still really in building state?
> > [18:07] < jcristau> carnil: it is not [18:07] < jcristau> guessing
> > the host crashed a few days ago and it got a power cycle
> > 
> > Which I did and the package is not back in building state for arm64.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Salvatore
> > 
> 
> Okay, so arm64 should be building now (thanks Salvatore!). Assuming no
> build failures, they should show up in the archive in a day or two.
> Chromium is a slow build. :)

They where built now!

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to