Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2022 20:18:43 -0400
with message-id
<CAD+GYvzZjXnEQ=hfrxmpyqoqwp6zk8e3rwjmfrm_0aequ2c...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting
lockdown
has caused the Debian Bug report #989580,
regarding kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting lockdown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
989580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: manpages
Version: 5.10-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
The patch that implemented lockdown lifting via SysRq ended up getting
dropped[*] before the feature was merged upstream, but the man page still
describes it.
I've submitted a patch upstream which has been accepted by a comaintainer:
https://github.com/alejandro-colomar/man-pages/commit/09df87e9ee3e1a429a2c1709dfd16ec8ff0f616
IMHO, it would be good to see if we can include this in bullseye since
Secure Boot/lockdown is becoming more widely used.
[*]
http://archive.lwn.net:8080/linux-kernel/cacdnjuuxam06tcnczoa6nwxhnmqueqqm3ma8btukzpucs+d...@mail.gmail.com/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
manpages depends on no packages.
manpages recommends no packages.
Versions of packages manpages suggests:
ii man-db [man-browser] 2.9.4-2
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.13-1
--- End Message ---
