Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:07:25 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#1008700: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #747424, regarding new "unstable" upstream version (1.9.1) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 747424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747424 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: geda-gaf Version: 1:1.8.2-4 Severity: wishlist hello pkg-electronics, the 1.9 series includes improvements in the area of schematic export (writing to pdf), and editing improvements. it features a new tool (gaf) and a new library (libgedacairo). as it is labelled unstable by upstream, it might not be suitable for anything in debian but experimental (i'd like to see it there for users to test the new features, or as a preparation for the next stable releases based on it), but that's best judged by the package maintainers. i'm pushing my experimental branch to git://prometheus.amsuess.com/geda-gaf-debian, which should produce working 1.9 packages. notable changes are: * libgeda42 -> libgeda44 (no reliable api anyway, just namechange and careless symbols update) * new libgedacairo{1,-dev} package (probably similarly unstable symbols, no symbols file yet) * new geda-gaf package (i know, it's confusing as it is equal to the source name and already used internaly (see rules file...), but it's consistent with the other geda-$UTILITY package names) lintian warns about shlibs-declares-dependency-on-other-package now, probably the dh_makeshlibs line needs rephrasing. one big caveat i noticed when up- and downgrading is the guile cache: after a downgrade, guile cache files linger around in the user directory. (example error messages below). it can be worked around by `rm -rf ~/.cache/guile`, but even if we don't officially support downgrades it would be better if that cache was somehow validated. probably not completely our business, maybe not even new in this upgrade, but still an issue i noticed when updating the package. who'd be upstream for this, guile or geda? best regards chrysn (some error messages to illustrate the cache issue and to make this findable by other affected users: > Unable to parse config from [/etc/gEDA/system-gafrc]: ERROR: Unbound > variable: %sys-data-dirs > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 702: 19 [map #<procedure 24d8e80 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3597:25 (mif-args)> #] > 3598: 18 [#<procedure 24d8e80 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3597:25 (mif-args)> (#)] > 2864: 17 [resolve-interface (gschem keymap) #:select ...] > 2789: 16 [#<procedure 24cb7a0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2777:4 (name #:optional > autoload version #:key ensure)> # ...] > 3065: 15 [try-module-autoload (gschem keymap) #f] > 2401: 14 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 25f2b70 at > ice-9/boot-9.scm:3066:17 ()>] > 3085: 13 [#<procedure 25f2b70 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3066:17 ()>] > In unknown file: > ?: 12 [primitive-load-path "gschem/keymap" ...] > In gschem/keymap.scm: > 20: 11 [#<procedure 25f98c0 ()>] > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 2951: 10 [define-module* (gschem keymap) #:filename ...] > 2926: 9 [resolve-imports ((#) (#) (#) (#) ...)] > 2864: 8 [resolve-interface (gschem hook) #:select ...] > 2789: 7 [#<procedure 24cb7a0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2777:4 (name #:optional > autoload version #:key ensure)> # ...] > 3065: 6 [try-module-autoload (gschem hook) #f] > 2401: 5 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 25f27e0 at > ice-9/boot-9.scm:3066:17 ()>] > 3085: 4 [#<procedure 25f27e0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3066:17 ()>] > In unknown file: > ?: 3 [primitive-load-path "gschem/hook" ...] > In gschem/hook.scm: > 45: 2 [#<procedure 2609b40 ()>] > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 102: 1 [#<procedure 24d9040 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)> > unbound-variable ...] > In unknown file: > ?: 0 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 25e2920> unbound-variable ...] > Tried to set the sensitivity on non-existent menu item '_Edit/Cu_t' ) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers. -- Bene Gesserit axiom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1:1.8.2-11+rm Dear submitter, as the package geda-gaf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1008700 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
