Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:55:19 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1017405: RM: pass-extension-otp -- ROM; package was
renamed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017405,
regarding RM: pass-extension-otp -- ROM; package was renamed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1017405: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017405
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Please remove pass-extension-otp from unstable, the binary package was renamed
to match upstream name.
Thanks!
Philip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 15.08.22 at 18:14, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
Please remove pass-extension-otp from unstable, the binary package was renamed
to match upstream name.
That package is in stable. How would upgrades work?
I was somehow of the impression that adding appropriate Provides /
Conflicts / Replaces would do the trick - but reading all the details of
https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages shows that's not the case.
Thanks for catching this - I'll fix the package now
Philip
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
