Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:00:37 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1020347: xfig: transition gsfonts/gsfonts-x11 -->
fonts-urw-base35
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020347,
regarding xfig: transition gsfonts/gsfonts-x11 --> fonts-urw-base35
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1020347: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020347
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfig
Severity: normal
Hi,
you are receiving this bug report, because your package declares a
relationship with the gsfonts and/or gsfonts-x11 packages. Both
packages have been replaced by fonts-urw-base35 since version
20200910-2 and are now merely transitional dummy packages. In order
to make it possible to remove these transitional packages, please
adjust the relationships for your package accordingly.
In the worst case, you will have to adjust some hard-coded font file
paths since the font files have been renamed between the gsfonts and
fonts-urw-base35 packages. Users of fontconfig to locate the font
files will most probably not notice any difference.
Cheers,
- Fabian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Source-Version: 1:3.2.8b-2
Hi Fabian!
On Di, 20 Sep 2022, [email protected] wrote:
> you are receiving this bug report, because your package declares a
> relationship with the gsfonts and/or gsfonts-x11 packages. Both
> packages have been replaced by fonts-urw-base35 since version
> 20200910-2 and are now merely transitional dummy packages. In order
> to make it possible to remove these transitional packages, please
> adjust the relationships for your package accordingly.
I fixed this yesterday by releasing xfig 3.2.8b-2, which
Suggests: fonts-urw-base35 (>= 20200910-4) | gsfonts-x11
now (I kept the gsfonts-x11 alternative for backwards compatibility if
someone wants to build a backport or the like; this will be removed in
a later version).
Greetings
Roland
--- End Message ---
