Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:36:00 +0100
with message-id <20221030163600.n4ob3bcsenmm5ng7@begin>
and subject line Re: Bug#840123: gnome-pkg-tools: Adding me as uploader?
has caused the Debian Bug report #840123,
regarding gnome-pkg-tools: Adding me as uploader?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
840123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnome-pkg-tools
Version: 0.19.7
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'll adopt the gnome-orca package, could I be added to
/usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/pkg-gnome.team so debian/control gets right
in the package?
Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
'testing-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'),
(500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.8.0 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gnome-pkg-tools depends on:
ii perl 5.24.1~rc3-3
Versions of packages gnome-pkg-tools recommends:
ii svn-buildpackage 0.8.6
gnome-pkg-tools suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Samuel
Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows] System -> Repartitioning Disk for Linux...
(By [email protected], Christopher Browne)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Henriksson, le sam. 08 oct. 2016 20:08:14 +0200, a ecrit:
> OTOH, if you're only interested in this package (or possibly a few more)
> and not intend to maintain a wider set of GNOME packages, then it might
> be more suitable to just list yourself explicitly instead of having
> your name be part of the @GNOME_UPLOADERS@ expansion.
Indeed, that was done quite a long time ago already.
Samuel
--- End Message ---
