Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:51:03 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1007507: fixed in famfamfam-flag 0.1-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007507,
regarding famfamfam-flag: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1007507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: famfamfam-flag
Version: 0.1-3.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: famfamfam-flag
Source-Version: 0.1-3.2
Done: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
famfamfam-flag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <[email protected]> (supplier of updated famfamfam-flag package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 01:25:21 +0100
Source: famfamfam-flag
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1-3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>
Closes: 1007507
Changes:
 famfamfam-flag (0.1-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non maintainer.
   * Migrate repository from alioth to salsa.
   * Convert to 3.0 source format (Closes: #1007507).
Checksums-Sha1:
 d4e44500397670695be76d207ad754e1c916db98 1816 famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.dsc
 83ea5434f5a9cc45bcd4cb55daea1d57da3e34ad 1880 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.debian.tar.xz
 398511bd02714b209dd4468c0a0d3f872fc7a8b5 5651 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 85e0155252b2c4d57c763cda1676b6761dc88630db81a8996bb61d04eb94cd6d 1816 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.dsc
 a9cabd8286ed7d4f215478e53704a74f41efa8a9681c2e6997303cd74ceaaa47 1880 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.debian.tar.xz
 2009ed3506bc489d853ae0dcb8f466dd0f20767e76e98a258579a7c3b5439f6a 5651 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 58f52d5ee38e8712587e78f0c19f3d3f 1816 misc optional famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.dsc
 cd5b08437c87a1bd9e520feb27d04a30 1880 misc optional 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2.debian.tar.xz
 fed8190ec7d829e5f7b57f835a51b7da 5651 misc optional 
famfamfam-flag_0.1-3.2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bk1z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to