Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:26:57 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1028380: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #773347,
regarding Recommends: libslf4j-java should be a dependency
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
773347: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773347
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jodreports-cli
Version: 2.4.0-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

without libslf4j-java jodreports does not run at all:

$ jodreports order-with-images-template.odt order-data.xml order.odt
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
org/slf4j/LoggerFactory
        at 
net.sf.jooreports.templates.xmlfilters.ScriptTagFilter.<clinit>(ScriptTagFilter.java:52)
        at 
net.sf.jooreports.templates.TemplatePreProcessor.<init>(TemplatePreProcessor.java:46)
        at 
net.sf.jooreports.templates.AbstractDocumentTemplate.preProcess(AbstractDocumentTemplate.java:90)
        at 
net.sf.jooreports.templates.AbstractDocumentTemplate.createDocument(AbstractDocumentTemplate.java:78)
        at net.sf.jodreports.cli.CreateDocument.main(CreateDocument.java:61)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.slf4j.LoggerFactory
        at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
        at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
        at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
        ... 5 more

Please change the recommendation into a dependency.

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 
'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages jodreports-cli depends on:
ii  default-jre         2:1.7-52
ii  libjodreports-java  2.4.0-3
ii  ure                 4.3.3-2

Versions of packages jodreports-cli recommends:
pn  libslf4j-java  <none>

jodreports-cli suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package jodreports has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1028380

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to