Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:21:11 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1029445: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029445,
regarding bridge-utils: new upstream 1.7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1029445: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029445
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
As indicated at
<https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/net/bridge-utils/>, upstream
is now at version 1.7.1 while Debian is still at 1.7.0.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-20-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fi:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages bridge-utils depends on:
ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u5
bridge-utils recommends no packages.
Versions of packages bridge-utils suggests:
ii ifupdown 0.8.36
- -- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/bridge-utils changed:
BRIDGE_HOTPLUG=yes
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEyJACx3qL7GpObXOQrh+Cd8S017YFAmPNaeYACgkQrh+Cd8S0
17bTcg//WR2Lmk1lC/l9TYMrMRpmAR1Z6T5pX6Ebd6L/qx3sjVwZFN7/OoAyS7Zm
A5V21X5x735ubkb2pIeYg8QmpIEcjU+Kx1azTwqUCvz54IoRq91B+i8eLDC5yWkl
dOCq3VGVPbEDjsKPsxSr0CpMApvvAg+hZRL9bM2JUrr6bomRMKpVzSc2GUMyARjH
ApRD/RJMR91FvdlUYDKBfMy1vTTkKUqqgpHyxxcgf2/FAO5X0u9aDOh0Y9/fHry8
wgccM9wnLONIpBxNUpSdzDSpvIh+08D5ZWrOws7A13MfPWQTcix3TLRvFUP5DWXq
E0dEoNYRe6rZlVBgfJsluqaZ6dO7o6iC7SgZdEvcguJnYSj71JhIrTq+DJwGhe1A
iQf5lWXz47uQdQ3rbJHiz6JJ8Xy79XDT9DYHM6OPcuDNP0tfoaMNZyvnmWosgPg2
D6doT8bBRjok0xuKl7UvPRPX+bStxxkgJl3uwpBFIKHt/TCDsSmba0g5LcztM2IK
pFZ3HoX1ERQZZujH0x9NE1IGFIKwrewBdfLnSsRuLZ0AnMSfAbDL09k1ycDxM573
uy8i/1zj2jfiQ1ZWT8HpGeajWVcJDcXQSTjogsZXRIbQjIDwbUac+yaDnQ94+7yr
17XLV+G3hijtK0fXYmLk4dTsoajdxdhoZxFoo0Fs6+zqYSB90E4=
=LVdp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
> Shouldn't it be also be send to -done as it's still listed as an open bug?
Yes, my fault.
Regards.
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
--- End Message ---
