Your message dated Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:04:36 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in
/usr/lib/systemd/system
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031695,
regarding debhelper: act on service files placed in usr/lib/systemd/system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1031695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031695
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.5.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
If some upstream install procedure places service files under
/usr/lib/systemd/system, dh_installsystemd won't notice those in
debian/tmp during package build, thus such units won't be enabled and
started on the installation of the resulting package.
I think this could (and should) be done irrespective of the usrmerge
transition and whether maintainer-provided unit files are installed into
/usr/lib or /lib, because this has little chance to change anything
automatically (unless some packages have been shipping unit files under
/usr/lib with the very purpose of not activating and starting them).
--
Thanks for your consideration,
Feri.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Niels, hello Sebastian
Am 24.03.23 um 16:28 schrieb Niels Thykier:
Sebastian Ramacher:
[...]
Any progress here? If this issue should be fixed for bookworm, time is
running short.
Cheers
I find that anytime I look at this bug my motivation to work on Debian
instantly vanishes. In fact, I cannot even motivate myself to read the
bug log to figure out what the consensus is. Accordingly, I will play
the constitution 2.1.1 and step out of the way.
My attempt to raise this issue with debhelper and the release-team was
to gather a consensus with how to deal with the affected packages.
A change to debhelper seemed liked the most straightforward approach to
me. It was not meant as an attempt to force Niels into something he
feels uncomfortable with, which he obviously does.
I apologize to Niels for that and hereby close this bug report.
Michael
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
