Your message dated Sat, 03 Jun 2023 00:35:21 +0200
with message-id <3740507.kQq0lBPeGt@bagend>
and subject line Re: firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023863,
regarding firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1023863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20221012-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
With a freshly made RPi 3 Bookworm image (with [1]) I booted up my
RPi 3B+ and noticed the following error in `dmesg`:
[ 19.801109] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
[ 19.815101] firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware for
information about missing firmware
[ 19.829633] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
All messages wrt 'brcmfmac' in `dmesg`:
[ 19.773206] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio
for chip BCM4345/6
[ 19.786577] usbcore: registered new interface driver brcmfmac
[ 19.801109] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
[ 19.829633] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: failed to load
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin (-2)
[ 19.843649] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin failed with error -2
[ 19.950059] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: direct-loading firmware
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.bin
[ 19.985340] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: direct-loading firmware
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.txt
[ 20.206331] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio
for chip BCM4345/6
[ 20.249761] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: firmware: direct-loading firmware
brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.clm_blob
[ 20.266765] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware: BCM4345/6 wl0: Apr 15
2021 03:03:20 version 7.45.234 (4ca95bb CY) FWID 01-996384e2
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/brcm
does not seem to have a file with that name though, but I've seen in
other places where a symlink was made.
Not sure if that's what missing here though.
If the kernel incorrectly reports this issue, please reassign.
The (cabled) network *does* work though, but as dmesg classified it
as an error, I've set the severity to normal.
Cheers,
Diederik
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/raspi-team/image-specs/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-3-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
firmware-brcm80211 depends on no packages.
firmware-brcm80211 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages firmware-brcm80211 suggests:
ii initramfs-tools 0.142
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 8 Feb 2023 11:10:05 +0100 Alexander Dalm <[email protected]> wrote:
> changes were made to the Kernel so now each of the files is requested
> board-specifc first, in your case:
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.bin
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.txt
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,3-model-b-plus.clm_blob
> and if not existent, falling back to the regular ones:
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.bin (symbolic link to
> cypress/cyfmac43455-sdio.bin)
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.txt (not existing -> different topic)
> brcm/brcmfmac43455-sdio.clm_blob (symbolic link to
> cypress/cyfmac43455-sdio.clm_blob
Ah, as I recently learned myself too, you're right.
It actually isn't an error as I thought, thus closing this bug.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
