Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:27:42 -0500
with message-id <12318041.O9o76ZdvQC@riemann>
and subject line Re: googletest on armel
has caused the Debian Bug report #1038160,
regarding googletest build fails on some 32bit architectures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1038160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038160
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:googletest
Version: 1.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie

according to
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=googletest

this build fails at least on armel and i386, making googletest uninstallable on these architectures.

Looking at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=googletest&suite=experimental

these already failed in experimental back in January 2023.

I don't have much sympathy for uploading that to unstable without addressing these issues for about half a year, causing issues with other package builds. googletest is now uninstallable on these architectures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 08:54:12 +0200 Mattias Ellert 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Investigating the armel build on the armmel porterbox
> (abel.debian.org).

> Compiling the unmodified file with -O1 insted of -O2 also results in
> that the test succeeds.

Thank you so much, Mattias!  
I uploaded a workaround in rev -4 using -O1.

This -- together with a workaround for x86 in rev -3 -- fixes this bug: all 
official architectures have built successfully now.

-Steve

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to