Your message dated Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:47:47 +0200
with message-id <12255668.O9o76ZdvQC@bagend>
and subject line Re: scdoc: bug preventing indented literal blocks
has caused the Debian Bug report #946835,
regarding scdoc: bug preventing indented literal blocks
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
946835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: scdoc
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I'm trying to build aerc (https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc), and there
is an error while "building" manpage for `doc/aerc-templates.7.scd`:

```
$ git clone https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc
$ cd aerc/
$ make
[...]
scdoc < doc/aerc-templates.7.scd > aerc-templates.7
Error at 32:3: Cannot deindent in literal block
make: *** [Makefile:48: aerc-templates.7] Error 1
```

The issue seems to be fixed by upstream: 
https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/scdoc/log/#log-5c782cda95427e7170bab7a9d7eef19c7c2d12d0

Is it possible to update to version 1.9.7 or backport the fix?

Regards,
Nicolas KAROLAK


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

Versions of packages scdoc depends on:
ii  libc6  2.28-10

scdoc recommends no packages.

scdoc suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.10.0-1

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:30:59 +0000 Nicolas Karolak <nico...@karolak.fr> wrote:
> Package: scdoc
> Version: 1.9.0-1
> 
> Is it possible to update to version 1.9.7 or backport the fix?

The first version >= 1.9.7 uploaded to Debian, was 1.10.0-1, so closing the bug 
with that version.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to