Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375657: fixed in cacao 0.96-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cacao
Version: 0.96-1
Severity: important

Hi,

After upgrading from binutils 2.16.1cvs20060413-1 to 2.17-1 cacao no
longer starts:

$ cacao 
cacao: error while loading shared libraries: libopcodes-2.16.91.so: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory

because the version of libopcodes have changed

/usr/lib/libopcodes-2.16.91.so (binutils 2.16.1cvs20060413)
/usr/lib/libopcodes-2.17.so    (binutils 2.17)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-vserver-k7
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cacao depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.17-1     The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  classpath                     2:0.91-3   clean room standard Java libraries
ii  classpath-common              2:0.91-3   architecture independent files
ii  libc6                         2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libltdl3                      1.5.22-4   A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.2.3-12 compression library - runtime

cacao recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 

=*= Lukasz Pankowski =*=


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cacao
Source-Version: 0.96-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cacao, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cacao_0.96-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.96-2.diff.gz
cacao_0.96-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.96-2.dsc
cacao_0.96-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.96-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cacao package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:33:54 +0000
Source: cacao
Binary: cacao
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.96-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cacao      - Java virtual machine
Closes: 375657
Changes: 
 cacao (0.96-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control: Don't Build-Depends on binutils-dev (Closes: #375657).
   * debian/rules: Added --disable-disassembler to DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS.
Files: 
 23a32bfec3f09b63b9a67195a4e6dc45 793 interpreters optional cacao_0.96-2.dsc
 738c63fa36aed42c7d71ed4d1282c108 7533 interpreters optional 
cacao_0.96-2.diff.gz
 87dc0c6fbfb871cd1a4a5fc639d67fe2 536556 interpreters optional 
cacao_0.96-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEot5SWSOgCCdjSDsRAtTTAJ9Ws6y1xrOhoAqOOq4Mo2+pmrvYLQCgk3MJ
6P+SxQXQEZeBRUpM/XwJmMc=
=tQI1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to