Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2023 11:04:42 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1007609: fixed in xjdic 24-11.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007609,
regarding xjdic: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1007609: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xjdic
Version: 24-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xjdic
Source-Version: 24-11.1
Done: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xjdic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <[email protected]> (supplier of updated xjdic package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 12:05:01 +0200
Source: xjdic
Architecture: source
Version: 24-11.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ludovic Drolez <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>
Closes: 968422 1007609
Changes:
 xjdic (24-11.1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Convert to source format 3.0. Closes: #1007609
   * Drop strlcat copy which is included in glibc now.
 .
   [ Helmut Grohne ]
   * Fix FTCBFS: Let dpkg's buildtools.mk supply a C compiler. Closes: #968422
Checksums-Sha1:
 81fe7a8ed9edc3377cff7e88d17c575df1ffb7b0 1502 xjdic_24-11.1.dsc
 2585eb4383bb3ce4e2a583d641136e9ad63fd082 11024 xjdic_24-11.1.debian.tar.xz
 d732bee5de972a9dacef7c60150e58413462a996 5407 xjdic_24-11.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9bc3220c814f6a0c6f6cbc575fc691b41e0dcbd1e3bab8ee1bd8935571ce5d51 1502 
xjdic_24-11.1.dsc
 3d84d3462552096aee498684972e9ccc682b7a3c37075c3bb0e8b5d40967767d 11024 
xjdic_24-11.1.debian.tar.xz
 66f97a73fd21e33313e1303f1099c7a8232655b9f33a1b295e5de36fc5353af4 5407 
xjdic_24-11.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 33552d152521d81a58443e05cf76e6ef 1502 text optional xjdic_24-11.1.dsc
 141b1a178d8d7bcb2e267dae73e54c8f 11024 text optional 
xjdic_24-11.1.debian.tar.xz
 abccd46290bb9f43d4e1cd353c7a7e86 5407 text optional 
xjdic_24-11.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=OFVB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to