Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:14:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193883: aptitude: temporary subdirectories don't get
removed on NFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.12-3
Severity: minor
I use a diskless client which gets its filesystems over NFS. When I
run aptitude on this system and install some new packages, the
temporary subdirectories don't get removed:
tomochan:~# aptitude
Reading package fields... 0%rm: cannot remove directory `/tmp/dpkgMTJfDg':
Directory not empty
rm cleanup failed, code 256
Reading package fields... 33%rm: cannot remove directory `/tmp/dpkgrNOFyx':
Directory not empty
rm cleanup failed, code 256
Reading package fields... 66%rm: cannot remove directory `/tmp/dpkgsqn92d':
Directory not empty
rm cleanup failed, code 256
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status.. Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% [0/3] ... E: execution expired
rm: cannot remove directory `/tmp/dpkgFqArRI': Directory not empty
rm cleanup failed, code 256
rm: cannot remove directory `/tmp/dpkgJxG8gQ': Directory not empty
rm cleanup failed, code 256
Reading changelogs... Done
apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n]?
Selecting previously deselected package libglib1.2-dev.
(Reading database ... 20521 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libglib1.2-dev (from .../libglib1.2-dev_1.2.10-9_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libgtk1.2-dev.
Unpacking libgtk1.2-dev (from .../libgtk1.2-dev_1.2.10-14_i386.deb) ...
Preparing to replace mplayer-dep-dev 0.3 (using
.../mplayer-dep-dev_0.4_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement mplayer-dep-dev ...
Setting up libglib1.2-dev (1.2.10-9) ...
Setting up libgtk1.2-dev (1.2.10-14) ...
Setting up mplayer-dep-dev (0.4) ...
Press return to continue.
aptitude leaves one empty subdirectory for every package installed or
updated.
The same applies to apt-listchanges. Should I file a second bug or
can this bug be duplicated onto that package?
Here is some additional info:
tomochan:~# ls -l /tmp/
total 104
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg1TuHUq
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg4N7iVF
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg5lpZI9
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg5riTic
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg8mcSdT
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkg9mzahg
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkgC5mVVr
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 21:15 dpkgFqArRI
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgGaejab
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkgIdhtde
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 21:15 dpkgJxG8gQ
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 21:15 dpkgMTJfDg
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgNEIN2y
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgNiszI1
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgSgvZaR
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgWdQyLz
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkgZVYhil
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:56 dpkgZoEo6C
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:56 dpkgbf7YU2
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:56 dpkgc2FfDF
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:39 dpkgiWMPzz
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgqmoYye
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:56 dpkgqzAcFj
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 21:15 dpkgrNOFyx
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 21:15 dpkgsqn92d
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 19 18:38 dpkgyv25Ci
tomochan:~# find /tmp/
/tmp/
/tmp/.X11-unix
/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
/tmp/.sockets
/tmp/.sockets/audio0
/tmp/dpkgGaejab
/tmp/.X0-lock
/tmp/dpkgSgvZaR
/tmp/dpkgqmoYye
/tmp/dpkgNEIN2y
/tmp/dpkgNiszI1
/tmp/dpkgWdQyLz
/tmp/dpkgyv25Ci
/tmp/dpkg5lpZI9
/tmp/dpkg9mzahg
/tmp/dpkgC5mVVr
/tmp/dpkgiWMPzz
/tmp/dpkg4N7iVF
/tmp/dpkg8mcSdT
/tmp/dpkgIdhtde
/tmp/dpkg5riTic
/tmp/dpkgZVYhil
/tmp/dpkg1TuHUq
/tmp/dpkgZoEo6C
/tmp/dpkgbf7YU2
/tmp/dpkgqzAcFj
/tmp/dpkgc2FfDF
/tmp/dpkgMTJfDg
/tmp/dpkgrNOFyx
/tmp/dpkgsqn92d
/tmp/dpkgFqArRI
/tmp/dpkgJxG8gQ
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tomochan 2.4.20 #6 Sam Mai 17 19:00:00 CEST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5 0.5.5 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 3.3-2 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.3.20030510-1 Shared libraries for terminal
handling
ii libsigc++0c102 1.0.4-6 Type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++5 3.3-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--
....Christian.Garbs.....................................http://www.cgarbs.de
"This is turning into one very sexy struggle for the human race."
(Zapp Brannigan)
pgpdkPrtnj5Up.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'm closing this bug, as it has been a long while without any activity,
and it was never clear what the bug was in the first place.
Please re-open if you see the same behaviour again.
Thanks for your time,
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--- End Message ---
