Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2023 17:13:41 +0300
with message-id <ZSFnleqHbbycbpLC@localhost>
and subject line kFreeBSD has been removed from Debian ports
has caused the Debian Bug report #634626,
regarding checkinstall: debian/control uses hardcoded list of kFreeBSD
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
634626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: checkinstall
Severity: wishlist
User: [email protected]
Usertags: kfreebsd-any
The debian/control file in checkinstall uses a hardcoded list of kfreebsd-*
architectures (e.g "kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64") to specify a package
relationship (most likely Build-Depends) that isn't specific to i386
or amd64 hardware. I.e. something like:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64]
Since this relationship would apply all the same for kfreebsd-* architectures
other than kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel
port), please consider using dpkg wildcards instead. For example:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [kfreebsd-any]
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
kFreeBSD has been removed from Debian ports:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2023/07/msg00003.html
cu
Adrian
--- End Message ---
