Your message dated Sat, 02 Dec 2023 13:48:22 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1053418: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053418,
regarding RM: libppd -- ROM; Dead upstream, binary package name collision
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1053418: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:libppd

Greetings,

As previously announced in #1052056 ("Intent To Remove: src:libppd"),
I'm asking you to remove the libppd package from Debian unstable.

The ressons boil down to:

First, upstream is dead, last release was in 2002-ish (by looking at
the latest timestamp in the orig.tar).

Second, some binary package names collide with a different libppd
implementation provided by CUPS. Several months ago I made an attempt to
resolve this by renaming the package here, but I gave up on this -
besides some obstacles I've changed my mind and doubt all this was worth
the efforts. (An RM for that libppd-legacy package will follow shortly.)


There is one reverse dependency outstide src:libppd, it's the gpr
package. It's likewise upstream-dead and dropped out of testing
recently for other reasons, and I doubt it's going to come back. The
maintainer was included in the Intent To Remove above, no reaction.

    Christoph (maintainer of src:libppd)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

    libppd |   2:0.10-9 | source
libppd-dev |   2:0.10-9 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x
   libppd0 |   2:0.10-9 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x
   ppdfilt |   2:0.10-9 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; Dead upstream, binary package name collision
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1053418

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to