Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2023 02:00:10 +0100
with message-id
<5rrbw336tdqusavaalacsdljspsoqlmqafzzipcy62uanj2...@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
and subject line Re: Bug#1025388: urlview: New upstream location with most
Debian changes applied
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025388,
regarding urlview: New upstream location with most Debian changes applied
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1025388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: urlview
Version: 0.9-23.1
Severity: wishlist
See https://github.com/sigpipe/urlview where the author was developing the
program.
Development is stalled but it would be good to import the last commit as new
upstream version
to get rid of Debian's patches.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1b-1
Noticed this late because it's against src:;
the new upstream is https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/urlview-ng.
At a glance, the github link appears to be:
all imported 2012 (with 0.9-19 cited)
15 commits of autohell churn
one patch from 2013
which is somehow worse than nothing at all,
even when compared to 0.9-24.
I also have my doubts whether sigpipe on github actually is Elkins
(complete lack of activity, address not correctly associated, &c.)
but that's neither here nor there;
it doesn't look like any care or thought was given to correcting
any of the plethora of issues that plagued urlview,
and I don't see anything that's worth importing from there.
Best,
наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
