Your message dated Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:43:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376549: another approach
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.62-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

The following patch adds override macros to turn ACL warns in
30_exim4-config_check_rcpt into denys.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages exim4-config depends on:
ii  adduser                       3.87       Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.2      Debian configuration management sy

exim4-config recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded
diff -ur exim4-4.62.old/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt 
exim4-4.62/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt
--- exim4-4.62.old/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt 
2006-07-03 17:20:52.000000000 +0200
+++ exim4-4.62/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt     
2006-07-03 17:53:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -201,8 +201,13 @@
   # this instead of !verify = reverse_host_lookup to catch deferrals
   # as well as outright failures.
   .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_REVERSE_DNS
+  .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_REVERSE_DNS_DENY
+  deny
+    message = Reverse DNS lookup failed for $sender_host_address (${if 
eq{$host_lookup_failed}{1}{failed}{deferred}})
+  .else
   warn
     message = X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 
$sender_host_address (${if eq{$host_lookup_failed}{1}{failed}{deferred}})
+  .endif
      condition = ${if and{{def:sender_host_address}{!def:sender_host_name}}\
                       {yes}{no}}
   .endif
@@ -211,8 +216,13 @@
   # Check against classic DNS "black" lists (DNSBLs) which list
   # sender IP addresses
   .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS
+  .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS_DENY
+  deny
+    message = $sender_host_address is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
+  .else
   warn
     message = X-Warning: $sender_host_address is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
+  .endif
     log_message = $sender_host_address is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
     dnslists = CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS
   .endif
@@ -222,8 +232,13 @@
   # whitelist certain domains that might be blacklisted. If you want one
   # blacklist per domain, you need to replicate the stanza for each DNSBL.
   .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS
+  .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS_DENY
+  deny
+    message = $sender_address_domain is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
+  .else
   warn
     message = X-Warning: $sender_address_domain is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
+  .endif
     log_message = $sender_address_domain is listed at $dnslist_domain 
($dnslist_value: $dnslist_text)
     !senders = ${if exists{CONFDIR/local_domain_dnsbl_whitelist}\
                     {CONFDIR/local_domain_dnsbl_whitelist}\

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:31:03PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > This accomplishes the same like your patch and does not require
> > > changes to our configuration.
> > 
> > Not a bad idea indeed.  Thanks.
> 
> If that's acceptable to you, can this bug be closed now?

Closing.

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to