Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:55:00 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#1064931: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #210377, regarding makedev: need extra devices on block major 43 for package enbd to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 210377: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=210377 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: makedev Version: 2.3.1-58 Severity: wishlist -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux nbd.it.uc3m.es 2.6.0-test2-SMP #2 SMP Tue Jul 29 21:21:57 CEST 2003 i686 unknown Versions of the packages makedev depends on: ii base-passwd 3.1.10 Debian Base System Password/Group Files For the enbd package (see debian unstable, etc.) I need the following pattern of device nodes on block major 43, with minors as indicated: nda 0 nda1 1 nda2 2 ... nda15 15 ndb 16 ndb1 17 ndb2 18 ... ndb15 31 ndc 32 ... I guess you can stop at ndd15 for normal use. But all 256 minors are potentially used, and there are people who use them. The naming scheme is FOO<letter>[numbers] and is needed by the client software. I'm not strict about FOO = nd, but I've never tried anything else. Under devfs, this transforms to names like nd/a/disc nd/a/1 nd/a/2 ... Implementing this scheme in makedev would allow me to use MAKEDEV at package installation for enbd, and hence get a bug off my back. Peter
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.3.1-97.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package makedev has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1064931 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
