Your message dated Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:05:09 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: base-files: Buster 10.1 listed as 10
has caused the Debian Bug report #940125,
regarding base-files: Buster 10.1 listed as 10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
940125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 10.3+deb10u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I seem to be current on all updates but noticed my version to be listed
as Debian 10 instead of 10.1 by lsb_release -r and neofetch. As I
checked /etc/issue and /etc/os-release both list my version as "10."
Is this a small issue or have I done something odd accidentally?
Thanks!
Damon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-17+b3
base-files recommends no packages.
base-files suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
El 12/9/19 a las 17:46, Damon Thomas escribió:
Package: base-files
Version: 10.3+deb10u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I seem to be current on all updates but noticed my version to be listed
as Debian 10 instead of 10.1 by lsb_release -r and neofetch. As I
checked /etc/issue and /etc/os-release both list my version as "10."
Is this a small issue or have I done something odd accidentally?
Hello. As I explained some time ago, this was due to a change in lsb-release
which used
to look at /etc/debian_version but it does no longer do.
This was reported as #939733 and it's currently marked as wontfix, so I can't
fix that.
The current base-files behavior regarding which files are updated at each point
release and which files are not is documented in the changelog with great
detail.
Thanks.
--- End Message ---
