Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:50:03 +0000
with message-id <e1sgidb-000ggp...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1070815: fixed in libdrm 2.4.121-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070815,
regarding libdrm-intel1 should be compiled for arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdrm-intel1
Version: 2.4.120-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: civil.o...@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

     I recently got an Ampere Altra board and I've decided to try getting
     Intel Arc 750 working on it. While that requires vendor-specific kernel
     patches (Workaround for Altra's PCIe Errata) and recent kernel
     (6.9.0-rc6 with drm-next/xe), I managed to get it working.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

     One of the obstacles I had, was that libdrm-intel1 is not compiled on
     arm64 systems in debian (testing or unstable or experimental). Upstream
     actually have nothing that prevents you from compiling it and only
     requires to add arm64 in control for libdrm-intel1.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

     I've actually managed to build libdrm-intel1 on aarch64.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.9.0-rc6+ (SMP w/64 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libdrm-intel1 depends on:
ii  libc6          2.38-7
ii  libdrm2        2.4.120-3
ii  libpciaccess0  0.17-3+b1

libdrm-intel1 recommends no packages.

libdrm-intel1 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- patch that I've applied to make it build:
--- libdrm-2.4.120.old/debian/control   2024-02-08 08:49:20.000000000 +0100
+++ libdrm-2.4.120/debian/control       2024-05-09 10:30:48.688180370 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 Architecture: linux-any hurd-any
 Depends:
  libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}),
- libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32],
+ libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [arm64 amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32],
  libdrm-radeon1 (= ${binary:Version}),
  libdrm-nouveau2 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
  libdrm-amdgpu1 (= ${binary:Version}),
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
  This is a udeb, or a microdeb, for the debian-installer.

 Package: libdrm-intel1
-Architecture: amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32
+Architecture: arm64 amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32
 Depends:
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends},

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libdrm
Source-Version: 2.4.121-1
Done: Timo Aaltonen <tjaal...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libdrm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1070...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Timo Aaltonen <tjaal...@debian.org> (supplier of updated libdrm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:31:37 +0300
Source: libdrm
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4.121-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debia...@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen <tjaal...@debian.org>
Closes: 1070815
Changes:
 libdrm (2.4.121-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * control: Add arm64 to libdrm-intel1 archs. (Closes: #1070815)
   * symbols: Updated.
Checksums-Sha1:
 9f2584ab15024e3eab6755cb8f4daca1e4ee4bf3 3168 libdrm_2.4.121-1.dsc
 dc61485b577eb7a69ad68d76cfac3ff033af87a0 480840 libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz
 9d6cb1b27c7761b3a558e3cbe902600892fef980 659 libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz.asc
 8534fd551fc1a087507c864ca727f4673c295faa 62308 libdrm_2.4.121-1.debian.tar.xz
 f822660207d887f46099799ad56cd0e90be025bf 8627 libdrm_2.4.121-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 477f05a16e73fb69067ba89884efa44306d11241bd99f2f77fd37339191a5bc2 3168 
libdrm_2.4.121-1.dsc
 909084a505d7638887f590b70791b3bbd9069c710c948f5d1f1ce6d080cdfcab 480840 
libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz
 d337303de9639513ed029da6b009ee1dfd0e11ba79af9dd93dfa5256b3f56207 659 
libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz.asc
 cae39a57d3a2b758df6a0a27f79c9d6768b19582e6afdf4388376e0b546d0b65 62308 
libdrm_2.4.121-1.debian.tar.xz
 2e8b5e15c755a5840a3f7b00dcc1d43f25b0bfed1f5305a756b93bc41dcc96c0 8627 
libdrm_2.4.121-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 0d8d8459b07497afd31bf99f15547f57 3168 libs optional libdrm_2.4.121-1.dsc
 9eaa82b7b7a79972c6b11dd25a4356b1 480840 libs optional 
libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz
 6421330589744e3c3a73fa19fa8c1045 659 libs optional 
libdrm_2.4.121.orig.tar.xz.asc
 48adb0944e99bfde7ade3e2e9edf3930 62308 libs optional 
libdrm_2.4.121-1.debian.tar.xz
 a84ce2cdf319b6a90526b875199bb904 8627 libs optional 
libdrm_2.4.121-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=aLxJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpHygE03PSwU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to