Your message dated Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:52:04 +0000
with message-id <e1srakc-009qdw...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066710: fixed in purple-lurch 0.7.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066710,
regarding purple-lurch: FTBFS: ./test/test_lurch_util.c:69:5: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘lurch_util_axc_log_func’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1066710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066710
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: purple-lurch
Version: 0.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection
> -std=c11 -Wall -g -Wstrict-overflow -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libpurple
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libomemo -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/axc
> -I/usr/include/signal -I/usr/include/signal -I./headers/jabber -O0 -c
> ./test/test_lurch_util.c -o build/test_lurch_util.o
> ./test/test_lurch_util.c: In function ‘test_lurch_util_axc_log_func_error’:
> ./test/test_lurch_util.c:69:5: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘lurch_util_axc_log_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 69 | lurch_util_axc_log_func(AXC_LOG_ERROR, "test", 4, axc_ctx_p);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_im_handler_disabled’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:831:92: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_im_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 831 | lurch_api_status_im_handler(NULL, other_bare_jid,
> lurch_api_status_im_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./test/test_lurch_api.c:13:
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:128:163: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 128 | void lurch_api_status_im_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char *
> contact_bare_jid, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_t status, void *
> user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_im_handler_not_supported’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:866:92: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_im_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 866 | lurch_api_status_im_handler(NULL, other_bare_jid,
> lurch_api_status_im_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:128:163: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 128 | void lurch_api_status_im_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char *
> contact_bare_jid, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_t status, void *
> user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_im_handler_no_session’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:905:92: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_im_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 905 | lurch_api_status_im_handler(NULL, other_bare_jid,
> lurch_api_status_im_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:128:163: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 128 | void lurch_api_status_im_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char *
> contact_bare_jid, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_t status, void *
> user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function ‘test_lurch_api_status_im_handler_ok’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:944:92: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_im_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 944 | lurch_api_status_im_handler(NULL, other_bare_jid,
> lurch_api_status_im_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:128:163: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 128 | void lurch_api_status_im_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char *
> contact_bare_jid, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_t status, void *
> user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function ‘test_lurch_api_status_im_handler_err’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:967:92: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_im_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 967 | lurch_api_status_im_handler(NULL, other_bare_jid,
> lurch_api_status_im_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:128:163: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 128 | void lurch_api_status_im_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char *
> contact_bare_jid, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_t status, void *
> user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_handler_disabled’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:994:104: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_chat_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer
> target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 994 | lurch_api_status_chat_handler(NULL, test_conversation_name,
> lurch_api_status_chat_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:137:176: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 137 | void lurch_api_status_chat_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char
> * full_conversation_name, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_chat_t status,
> void * user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_handler_enabled’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1022:104: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘lurch_api_status_chat_handler’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer
> target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1022 | lurch_api_status_chat_handler(NULL, test_conversation_name,
> lurch_api_status_chat_handler_cb_mock, mock_user_data);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/../src/lurch_api.h:137:176: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of
> type ‘const char *’
> 137 | void lurch_api_status_chat_handler(PurpleAccount * acc_p, const char
> * full_conversation_name, void (*cb)(int32_t err, lurch_status_chat_t status,
> void * user_data_p), void * user_data_p);
> |
>
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_discover_cb_anonymous’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1060:26: warning: assignment discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1060 | cb_data->user_data_p = mock_user_data;
> | ^
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_discover_cb_no_devicelist’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1101:26: warning: assignment discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1101 | cb_data->user_data_p = mock_user_data;
> | ^
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1112:17: warning: initialization discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1112 | .name = test_conversation_name
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_discover_cb_ok’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1185:26: warning: assignment discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1185 | cb_data->user_data_p = mock_user_data;
> | ^
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1196:17: warning: initialization discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1196 | .name = test_conversation_name
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c: In function
> ‘test_lurch_api_status_chat_discover_cb_error’:
> ./test/test_lurch_api.c:1247:26: warning: assignment discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> 1247 | cb_data->user_data_p = mock_user_data;
> | ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:154: build/test_lurch_util.o] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/purple-lurch_0.7.0-2_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: purple-lurch
Source-Version: 0.7.0-2.1
Done: Andreas Metzler <ametz...@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
purple-lurch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Metzler <ametz...@debian.org> (supplier of updated purple-lurch package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 14:27:06 +0200
Source: purple-lurch
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: DebianOnMobile Maintainers
<debian-on-mobile-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <ametz...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066710 1071952
Changes:
purple-lurch (0.7.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add missing prototype to fix ftbfs. Closes: #1066710
* Use pkg-config to locate libgcrypt. Closes: #1071952
Checksums-Sha1:
c63fc1bbf977b47ee429001327764482893aa66e 2253 purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.dsc
a2981bc73e39774f8b1a7fab48ab54c1d4697333 13192
purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
649423ca8685a29e0b2393a6495e2417de3e888ca75c0772d08cf9afe395c95d 2253
purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.dsc
7c0e8cdced65ce29a34af3cec11fb7290036ee4b3f912a1fc174da4e0470f171 13192
purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
0bda54f31a2d70b7460052d01aec4936 2253 net optional purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.dsc
ab34067854a34ab3c1c75dec18015b8a 13192 net optional
purple-lurch_0.7.0-2.1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7yRg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpBkV4fTi1_Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
