Your message dated Wed, 28 Aug 2024 01:40:33 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#463119: libattr1-dev: set_attr(3) doesn't mention 
xattr.h, needed for ENOATTR
has caused the Debian Bug report #463119,
regarding libattr1-dev: set_attr(3) doesn't mention xattr.h, needed for ENOATTR
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
463119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libattr1-dev
Version: 1:2.4.39-1
Severity: minor

set_attr(3) mentions the constant ENOATTR as a possible error value,
but not that this constant is defined in xattr.h. Normally one expects
to get error values from errno.h, so perhaps it's worth mentioning
that the library defines some extra error values, in this and similar
man pages.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (601, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libattr1-dev depends on:
ii  libattr1                      1:2.4.39-1 Extended attribute shared library
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]          2.7-6      GNU C Library: Development Librari

libattr1-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.48-1

Hi!

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 17:14:04 +0000, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: libattr1-dev
> Version: 1:2.4.39-1
> Severity: minor

> set_attr(3) mentions the constant ENOATTR as a possible error value,
> but not that this constant is defined in xattr.h. Normally one expects
> to get error values from errno.h, so perhaps it's worth mentioning
> that the library defines some extra error values, in this and similar
> man pages.

This stopped being an issue once the <attr/xattr.h> header got removed
upstream, as they added at the same time a definition for ENOATTR in
<attr/attributes.h>. So I'm closing this.

Thanks,
Guillem

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to