Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:03:17 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Re: Bug#978588: firefox: should depend on either libgdk-pixbuf package has caused the Debian Bug report #978588, regarding firefox: should depend on either libgdk-pixbuf package to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 978588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978588 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: firefox Version: 84.0-3 Severity: important The libgdk-pixbuf packages are migrating from libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 to libgdk-pixbuf-2.0.0 The most recent firefox package has matched this name transition. However many other packages have not yet made the transition, causing clashes which require their removal. Popular packages include mutter and gimp. This significantly impacts the overall usability of the system. The dependency should be: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 This is the practice recommended by libgdk-pixbuf Firefox only requires 2.22.0 which either package can meet.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 12:05:07 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > David Tulloh wrote: > > The libgdk-pixbuf packages are migrating from > > libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 to libgdk-pixbuf-2.0.0 > > > > The most recent firefox package has matched this name transition. > > > > However many other packages have not yet made the transition, causing > > clashes which require their removal. Popular packages include > > mutter and gimp. This significantly impacts the overall usability of the > > system. > > The bug report did not include details of the system on which you are > installing Firefox. Is it Debian testing/unstable, or something else? > > Please explain in more detail what the problem is here? We have > provided a transitional libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 package which does not > conflict with libgdk-pixbuf-2.0.0, so you should be able to upgrade > to libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.40.2) and libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (>= 2.42), > which will satisfy both the "old" and the "new" dependency. Is there a > reason why you cannot do that? There was no response to this, so I'm going to assume that everything is now working as intended. smcv
--- End Message ---
