Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:38:45 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#1066700: pgdbf: FTBFS: pgdbf.c:533:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] has caused the Debian Bug report #1066700, regarding pgdbf: FTBFS: pgdbf.c:533:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1066700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: pgdbf Version: 0.6.2-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: [email protected] Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o pgdbf.o pgdbf.c > pgdbf.c: In function ‘main’: > pgdbf.c:533:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you > mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 533 | if(asprintf(&pgfields[fieldnum].formatstring, "%%.%dlf", > fields[fieldnum].decimals) < 0) { > | ^~~~~~~~ > | vsprintf > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[3]: *** [Makefile:366: pgdbf.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/pgdbf_0.6.2-1.1_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;[email protected] or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Lucas, On 2024-03-13 12:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part (hopefully): > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 > > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. > > -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat > > -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o pgdbf.o pgdbf.c > > pgdbf.c: In function ‘main’: > > pgdbf.c:533:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you > > mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > 533 | if(asprintf(&pgfields[fieldnum].formatstring, > > "%%.%dlf", fields[fieldnum].decimals) < 0) { > > | ^~~~~~~~ > > | vsprintf > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[3]: *** [Makefile:366: pgdbf.o] Error 1 With the glibc version currently in unstable pgdbf builds fine. asprintf is now available by default: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=0d5cb2ae27c0a163c15e5222fb132bf9d026b14b Closing this bug.
--- End Message ---
