Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:00:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.32-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: manpages-dev Version: 2.28-1 Severity: normal The man page for ftruncate(2) says: If the file previously was shorter, it is extended, However this is not always true. The glibc documentation says: The POSIX standard leaves it implementation defined what happens if the specified new LENGTH of the file is bigger than the original size. The `ftruncate' function might simply leave the file alone and do nothing Empirical evidence shows that Linux returns EPERM and leaves the file unchanged when trying to extend files on a vfat filesystem. Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-w64 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on: ii manpages 2.28-1 Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin manpages-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ----- GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them. -- The GNU Manifesto Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--- End Message ---
