Your message dated Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:08:28 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1039343: fixed in rarpd 0.981107-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039343,
regarding rarpd: ships sysv-init script without systemd unit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1039343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rarpd
Severity: important
User: [email protected]
Usertags: missing-systemd-service
Dear Maintainer(s),
rarpd has been flagged by Lintian as shipping a sysv-init script
without a corresponding systemd unit file. The default init system in
Debian is systemd, and so far this worked because a transitional
sysv-init-to-unit generator was shipped by systemd. This is in the
process of being deprecated and will be removed by the time Trixie
ships, so the remaining packages that ship init scripts without
systemd units will stop working.
There are various advantages to using native units, for example the
legacy generator cannot tell the different between a oneshot service
and a long running daemon. Also, sanboxing and security features
become available for services. For more information, consult the
systemd documentation:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html
You can find the Lintian warning here:
https://lintian.debian.org/sources/rarpd
In case this is a false positive, please add a Lintian override to
silence it and then close this bug.
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rarpd
Source-Version: 0.981107-9.1
Done: наб <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rarpd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
наб <[email protected]> (supplier of updated rarpd package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:11:32 +0100
Source: rarpd
Architecture: source
Version: 0.981107-9.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mats Erik Andersson <[email protected]>
Changed-By: наб <[email protected]>
Closes: 1039343
Changes:
rarpd (0.981107-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* d/rarpd.service: add (Closes: #1039343)
Checksums-Sha1:
62087ed61820d5dd806adc61eac71ce0c05afb77 1686 rarpd_0.981107-9.1.dsc
7acea1138e5f6cac3fb6374fe538edf8917a39b1 11580 rarpd_0.981107-9.1.debian.tar.xz
14caaead399bb3d96dbfac5e55cdb398485add2a 5806
rarpd_0.981107-9.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d2ede43c9c2ad31f1c19c4c7373bda5ef90b60ed87d6c6b9396ab5a4d71191f3 1686
rarpd_0.981107-9.1.dsc
b45547968536317231338d9b221d0d51d70682aaef656bbc3b4d2c6dbe441ef8 11580
rarpd_0.981107-9.1.debian.tar.xz
9f539672cf8659a21bfad553acc65d6b261bdfb7f798a6498d335dde0c55f5eb 5806
rarpd_0.981107-9.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
99d0cff84e7b96573c305e17bf55fb74 1686 net extra rarpd_0.981107-9.1.dsc
5efbc177c1d0c3c3a5c53b5174767468 11580 net extra
rarpd_0.981107-9.1.debian.tar.xz
196876d11a80e8fbc71f399c0a15efcf 5806 net extra
rarpd_0.981107-9.1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=A9xY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpYkMFmGp2F_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
