Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:02:02 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: openssl: missing documentation for sha256 support
has caused the Debian Bug report #546802,
regarding openssl: missing documentation for sha256 support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
546802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546802
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8k-4
Severity: minor

It seems like at least the x509 man page is somewhat out of date:

$ openssl x509 -sha256 -noout -fingerprint -in newcert.pem
SHA256 
Fingerprint=B6:7A:EE:04:7A:70:54:B9:32:F3:17:68:12:50:23:D6:38:F8:06:62:3F:28:06:EA:4C:30:B8:9D:8F:B1:B7:F4
$ man x509 | grep sha256
$

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openssl depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.9-25            GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libssl0.9.8            0.9.8k-4          SSL shared libraries
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime

openssl recommends no packages.

Versions of packages openssl suggests:
ii  ca-certificates               20090814   Common CA certificates

-- no debconf information

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen 
Redpill Linpro -- Changing the game!
t: +47 21 54 41 73



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2009-09-15 22:12:07 [+0200], Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It seems like at least the x509 man page is somewhat out of date:
> 
> $ openssl x509 -sha256 -noout -fingerprint -in newcert.pem
> SHA256 
> Fingerprint=B6:7A:EE:04:7A:70:54:B9:32:F3:17:68:12:50:23:D6:38:F8:06:62:3F:28:06:EA:4C:30:B8:9D:8F:B1:B7:F4
> $ man x509 | grep sha256
> $

A bit of time passed since the original report. The x509 man page is
deprecated. The correct one would be openssl-x509. What you look for is
a bit hidden:
| -digest
|     The  digest  to  use.   This  affects  any  signing  or  printing  option
|     that uses a message digest, such as the -fingerprint, -key, and -CA 
options.
|     Any digest supported by the openssl-dgst(1) command can be used.  If not
|     specified then SHA1 is used with -fingerprint or the default digest for 
the
|     signing algorithm is used, typically SHA256.

Sebastian

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to