Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2025 20:42:56 +0400
with message-id 
<CALWFqqB+iAMDkFWSt3rXHikCB0-=HWLk4=_sKnSmzmqaCc=z...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031655,
regarding Lutris: "The wine build you have selected does not support 
Esync/Fsync"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1031655: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031655
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wine
Version: 8.0~repack-4
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Dear Maintainer,

When I select "System (8.0 (Debian 8.0~repack-4))" in Lutris under a
game's "Runner option" and then trying to select "Enable Esync" or
"Enable Fsync" in that same menu I get the following error message:

  Incompatible Wine version detected
  The Wine build you have selected does not support Esync.
  Please switch to a Esync-capable version.

or:

  Incompatible Wine version detected
  The Wine build you have selected does not support Fsync
  Please switch to a Fsync-capable version.

According to its mouse-over description they are there to increase
multi-threaded performance. They sound like build options to me and work
with the following other runners for me: lutris-mtga-5.0-x86_64 or
lutris-GE-Proton7-35-x86_64.

Would it make sense to somehow enable these options in Debian's wine
version, too? (Or are they non-sense options? I haven't verified their
performance boost claims.)

Regards, Linus


*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- Package-specific info:
/usr/bin/wine points to /usr/bin/wine-stable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages wine depends on:
ii  wine32  8.0~repack-4
ii  wine64  8.0~repack-4

wine recommends no packages.

Versions of packages wine suggests:
ii  dosbox       0.74-3-4+b1
ii  kio-extras   4:22.12.2-1
pn  playonlinux  <none>
pn  q4wine       <none>
pn  winbind      <none>
pn  wine-binfmt  <none>
ii  winetricks   20220411-1

Versions of packages libwine depends on:
ii  libasound2                       1.2.8-1+b1
ii  libc6                            2.36-8
ii  libcapi20-3                      1:3.27-3+b1
ii  libfontconfig1                   2.14.1-4
ii  libfreetype6                     2.12.1+dfsg-4
ii  libglib2.0-0                     2.74.5-1
ii  libgphoto2-6                     2.5.30-1
ii  libgphoto2-port12                2.5.30-1
ii  libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0   1.22.0-3
ii  libgstreamer1.0-0                1.22.0-2
ii  libpcap0.8                       1.10.3-1
ii  libpulse0                        16.1+dfsg1-2+b1
ii  libudev1                         252.5-2
ii  libunwind8                       1.6.2-3
ii  libusb-1.0-0                     2:1.0.26-1
ii  libx11-6                         2:1.8.3-3
ii  libxext6                         2:1.3.4-1+b1
ii  libz-mingw-w64                   1.2.13+dfsg-1
ii  ocl-icd-libopencl1 [libopencl1]  2.3.1-1

Versions of packages libwine recommends:
ii  fonts-liberation           1:1.07.4-11
ii  fonts-wine                 8.0~repack-4
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-good  1.22.0-4
ii  libasound2-plugins         1.2.7.1-1
ii  libcups2                   2.4.2-1+b2
ii  libdbus-1-3                1.14.6-1
ii  libgl1                     1.6.0-1
ii  libgl1-mesa-dri            22.3.5-1
ii  libgnutls30                3.7.9-1
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2           1.20.1-1
ii  libkrb5-3                  1.20.1-1
ii  libodbc2                   2.3.11-2
ii  libosmesa6                 22.3.5-1
ii  libsdl2-2.0-0              2.26.3+dfsg-1
ii  libv4l-0                   1.22.1-5+b1
ii  libvulkan1                 1.3.239.0-1
ii  libxcomposite1             1:0.4.5-1
ii  libxcursor1                1:1.2.1-1
ii  libxfixes3                 1:6.0.0-2
ii  libxi6                     2:1.8-1+b1
ii  libxinerama1               2:1.1.4-3
ii  libxrandr2                 2:1.5.2-2+b1
ii  libxrender1                1:0.9.10-1.1
ii  libxxf86vm1                1:1.1.4-1+b2

Versions of packages libwine suggests:
ii  cups-bsd                   2.4.2-1+b2
ii  gstreamer1.0-libav         1.22.0-2
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad   1.22.0-3
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly  1.22.0-2
pn  ttf-mscorefonts-installer  <none>

Versions of packages wine32 depends on:
ii  libc6    2.36-8
ii  libwine  8.0~repack-4

wine32 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages wine32 suggests:
pn  wine32-preloader  <none>

Versions of packages wine64 depends on:
ii  libc6    2.36-8
ii  libwine  8.0~repack-4

Versions of packages wine64 recommends:
ii  wine32  8.0~repack-4

Versions of packages wine64 suggests:
pn  wine64-preloader  <none>

Versions of packages wine is related to:
pn  dxvk                     <none>
pn  dxvk-wine32-development  <none>
pn  dxvk-wine64-development  <none>
ii  fonts-wine               8.0~repack-4

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lutris
Version: 0.5.19-2

Fixed upstream in 0.5.14
https://github.com/lutris/lutris/commit/992d421a0ea0587a0906324e450129ad84a6c582

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to