Your message dated Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:33:58 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1115087: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1115087,
regarding RM: spek -- ROM; it doesn't build, no activity since 2023 and similar 
package already in Debian
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1115087: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1115087
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:spek

I would like to request the removal of a package I maintain, spek,
because it doesn't build with the latest version of ffmpeg, on which it
depends, and because it doesn't look like upstream is interested in
keeping the project alive.

If you browse both the GitHub issues page and pull requests one, you'll
see many unanswered questions and proposals, some dating back to 2017.

https://github.com/alexkay/spek/

The last commit was by me and it's a patch to fix build failure with
GCC-13 on Debian. It's from two years ago.

I don't think upstream is really dead, but he probably doesn't have
enough time to keep the project up to date to Debian quality standards.

Besides, there is already SoX in Debian, which can make a spectrogram
from an audio file. Granted, SoX has no GUI, it's just a command line
program. However Spek is just a GUI with an audio file spectrogram
inside and, since audio file spectrograms are kind of a niche/expert
need, I think it's safe to say that who wants them will both be able and
willing to type

$ sox music.flac -n spectrogram

That's all I had to write to support my case. Thank you very much.

-- 
Matteo Bini

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

      spek | 0.8.5+dfsg-5.1 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, 
mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; it doesn't build, no activity since 2023 and similar package already in 
Debian
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1115087

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to