Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:49:32 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1118236: fixed in tucnak 4.67-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1118236,
regarding tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1118236: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118236
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable
Package: tucnak
Version: 4.67-1
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-suggests
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
I see that the package tucnak (version 4.67-1) suggests ntp and ntpdate
which are not in unstable.
This can be seen in https://packages.debian.org/unstable/tucnak . Search
for "Package not available".
The missing packages used to be in Debian but they were removed some
time ago:
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntp
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntpdate
Should they be dropped or changed? Should it suggest something else such
as systemd-timesyncd? chrony?
Thank you,
--
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | [email protected] | [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tucnak
Source-Version: 4.67-2
Done: tony mancill <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tucnak, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill <[email protected]> (supplier of updated tucnak package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:37:20 -0700
Source: tucnak
Architecture: source
Version: 4.67-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <[email protected]>
Changed-By: tony mancill <[email protected]>
Closes: 1118236
Changes:
tucnak (4.67-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
* Update Suggests to use "ntpsec | time-daemon" (Closes: #1118236)
Checksums-Sha1:
aaeb811f57426a21bcb797308e0717b0854252b4 2437 tucnak_4.67-2.dsc
6789f174d54e7c256f185bac70bad3b55c9d921e 7868 tucnak_4.67-2.debian.tar.xz
1e67507fb7314007d772d88fe6d614ffe506bdd2 16778 tucnak_4.67-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
70a2f390cd2376db446e59add46efed56cb8b1314e09ecc78299aa4dfdf27fda 2437
tucnak_4.67-2.dsc
a3a5a05e9c4f7162f1df61c07039300c1683d36499edee01677c0b653425e8a2 7868
tucnak_4.67-2.debian.tar.xz
89e8122c641004e59a250d7f6475635014fef2663e8e90857b3fec98dc7e41a4 16778
tucnak_4.67-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
510766ac9c6f6f2cec8a6cff7249ddf3 2437 hamradio optional tucnak_4.67-2.dsc
6fb5ed55691d6362f145296dcaa1d981 7868 hamradio optional
tucnak_4.67-2.debian.tar.xz
56716e27c0d3681fcdb8400ba204ea61 16778 hamradio optional
tucnak_4.67-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=h0pw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpkKh_jb6VdH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
