Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2025 06:33:51 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1116357: fixed in ratmenu 2.3.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #1116357,
regarding ratmenu: Intend to Orphan: ratmenu
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1116357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1116357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ratmenu
Version: 2.3.22
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin <[email protected]>, Package Salvaging Team 
<[email protected]>

Hi Mark,
 
This is an attempt to introduce a new procedure, which I propose to call
Intend To Orphan. While we have an established process for making minimal,
fine-grained changes to a package, it does not cover broader
improvements such as migrating to Salsa, updating the Standards-Version,
or adjusting the debhelper compatibility level. However, some packages
could benefit from more extensive changes, and this procedure aims to
provide a structured way to implement them. Unlike the well-established
Package Salvage procedure[1] which requires an active Uploader, the goal
here is to allow collaborative work on a package on Salsa, even if no
active uploader expresses interest in maintaining it.
 
 --> Maintainer set to Debian QA Group <[email protected]>
 
If you do not agree to large-scale changes to this package, including
maintaining it on Salsa, feel free to close this bug or tag it as
'wontfix' to inform others. There is no obligation to continue reading
if your stance is clear, and that decision will, of course, be
respected.
 
Otherwise, I will follow the well-established timing of the ITS
procedure, waiting 21 days before performing a QA Upload to delayed=10.
 
This procedure has not yet reached consensus--I am simply exploring
whether it could be accepted. It was disussed at DebConf25 but some
consensus is pending. Please keep in mind that the goal of this process
is to help ensure that packages remain up to date and well maintained.
If you have suggestions for improving it, your feedback is most welcome.
 
I'm interested in orphaning the package ratmenu.  It meets the following
criteria:
 
  - Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
    maintainer.
  - Its a Debian native package but its not maintained in Git
    which makes it hard to access for other maintainers.
  - There are QA issues with the package.
  - Not on Salsa but it could profit from team maintenance
  - No maintainer upload in the last 11 years
  - Standards-Version < 4
 
I have set up a repository within Debian/[2]. This team functions
similarly to the former collab-maint on Alioth, allowing any Debian
Developer to make team uploads[3]. I understand that some maintainers
may prefer not to transition to collaborative maintenance, and I want to
emphasize that this is not intended as a hostile action. My goal is to
make the transition to using a Git repository on Salsa smoother and more
convenient for you.
 
This package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[4] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to help newcomers become familiar
with a consistent Git-based workflow.
 
Kind regards
    Andreas.
 
[1] 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ratmenu
[3] 
https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Collaborative_Maintenance:_.22Debian.22_group
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 
'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_DE:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ratmenu
Source-Version: 2.3.23
Done: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ratmenu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> (supplier of updated ratmenu package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:48:50 +0200
Source: ratmenu
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>
Closes: 971051 1116357
Changes:
 ratmenu (2.3.23) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
     Closes: #1116357
 .
   [ Helmut Grohne ]
   * Fix FTCBFS: Defer stripping to dh_strip. (Closes: #971051)
 .
   [ Andreas Tille ]
   * Maintain package on Salsa
   * Use Tracker as Homepage
   * Standards-Version: 4.7.2 (routine-update)
   * debhelper-compat 13 (routine-update)
   * Remove trailing whitespace in debian/changelog (routine-update)
   * Remove empty postinst
   * d/copyright: DEP5
Checksums-Sha1:
 7b89353583db5c5acffe58913ca8e3307962db10 1595 ratmenu_2.3.23.dsc
 dd120e6c2e1c5f92e419ee008fc1aaf0f05df41d 14572 ratmenu_2.3.23.tar.xz
 9051ac85e7b1d559273ea966eef1c85d7b187953 6066 ratmenu_2.3.23_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1989650aa8a0d4cfe8c277a50cc79fe655e680734ebd362463b90089d25fd02c 1595 
ratmenu_2.3.23.dsc
 9a89c41657806d2f84e247b098f866ef2640b078a4f9ee038b915e84a4eccee9 14572 
ratmenu_2.3.23.tar.xz
 7b65c6433d44b1179f94c7da18b7bedcf3e3d514ac66dda0225e44f70aa0d8a9 6066 
ratmenu_2.3.23_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 0322193f3f1500f5f383c3e5c23ae7fa 1595 x11 optional ratmenu_2.3.23.dsc
 d5f890b0683c8401317ab7c9926982b8 14572 x11 optional ratmenu_2.3.23.tar.xz
 d567054fefa1b8de684cfc1f23342267 6066 x11 optional 
ratmenu_2.3.23_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEE8fAHMgoDVUHwpmPKV4oElNHGRtEFAmjx2mYRHHRpbGxlQGRl
Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQV4oElNHGRtEzIA/8CcRu2Ma4fQb3erGvsHbtzC5ar6a8P5Oe
hJ4sPsywRwhcr+dJydApse4mGecAwFdqQJZCzAw3dtOZWISMkSy25rHFTdksp9WD
Y+mFqrAcgkH7Z1p0KHGy3ZWYLzYPnB4WYuRhg0DPUYOldaO5z/N1JWHm+pVgXNuZ
VtVhkvCMnzsxr/g+oteACIxB6b1+ik4Dlp4JhRo+UWjvJlrae9PRDU/oDaNVa+zo
4J96IGLGZTAkM4VVutegtSrYgxz9zAu9CliASIcd6V6MmSL9jGz7Jz8c2dyQK5gS
vB/tAPFeaLGB3WlmfKtRqNCN/H8kmV0uY1nXTpxwZhI0R791M84vs+E2XN1nDZSv
wPwggbFD4wg/jRAkTQWETRuwC4rT+iBaJ5O6c2NlqvMcvs87DMv6Aa5Bv62rmqBG
00cW+s7//pO/DgoiIoc1dLbJhVpatOHPX6CIMKBu4prfb1zktjYGKVoIqQU/Ze4I
W56YwkyUbf0pPjpiD3Rh9MpFJIERqW3BHTK+KoWtnZ2kBAFqFsGfvlFd3GQqQ4es
Su/agmvC5F4neEpoNEw4TnXgmOXj1ICP1vO511B9P5WlIYf+9R+f2ZLkrOsNFY10
NKuOZYVeXL8zY/jfTfV9ExollJL52+D1i1WCBYwadYiCC76DMtPJrKIDVouqmxy0
ZnFaxE8hekY=
=lBVT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpV9QM085DRI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to