Your message dated Thu, 29 Jan 2026 07:56:31 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033728: sudo-ldap might be removed post-bookworm or
post-trixie
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033728,
regarding sudo-ldap might be removed post-trixie
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1033728: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sudo-ldap
Severity: important
The sudo-ldap package is difficult to maintain. It is, however, still
more popular than the more modern and more flexible libnss-sudo, see
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=sudo
I'd like to ask the users of the sudo-ldap package why they are not
using libnss-sudo. I am especially interested in things that sudo-ldap
does better than libsss-sudo.
Most current deployments of LDAP with Linux clients for console and ssh
login are likely to be using sssd the uid and password management
anyway, so it seems just natural to use sss for sudo management as well.
Please add your reasons to this bug, so that the sudo maintainers can
properly consider the reasons in their decision.
Greetings
Marc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.17p2-2
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:41:16AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> I'd like to ask the users of the sudo-ldap package why they are not
> using libnss-sudo. I am especially interested in things that sudo-ldap
> does better than libsss-sudo.
sudo-ldap is now gone, please migrate to libnss-sudo before the forky
release.
Greetings
Marc
--- End Message ---
