Your message dated Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:01:10 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1134248: pyresample: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1134248,
regarding pyresample: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1134248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1134248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pyresample
Version: 1.35.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Usertags: gdal-3.13

Dear Maintainer,

Your package FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0 due to test failures:

 FAILED 
test/test_utils/test_rasterio.py::TestFromRasterio::test_get_area_def_from_raster_non_georef_respects_proj_dict[True-False]
 FAILED 
test/test_utils/test_rasterio.py::TestFromRasterio::test_get_area_def_from_raster_non_georef_respects_proj_dict[True-True]
 = 2 failed, 1120 passed, 25 skipped, 15 deselected, 465 warnings in 143.55s 
(0:02:23) =

https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyresample/unstable/amd64/70369723/

This may be an issue in rasterio.

Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 8/14/26 12:46 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:12:39 +0200 Bas Couwenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
Your package FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0 due to test failures:

 FAILED 
test/test_utils/test_rasterio.py::TestFromRasterio::test_get_area_def_from_raster_non_georef_respects_proj_dict[True-False]
 FAILED 
test/test_utils/test_rasterio.py::TestFromRasterio::test_get_area_def_from_raster_non_georef_respects_proj_dict[True-True]
 = 2 failed, 1120 passed, 25 skipped, 15 deselected, 465 warnings in 143.55s 
(0:02:23) =

https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyresample/unstable/amd64/70369723/

This may be an issue in rasterio.

I'm not able to reproduce this issue with the version of gdal currently in 
unstable (3.13.2).

Is this still an issue?

No.

Probably it has been fixed by recent versions of rasterio.

Yes, see the debci history, specifically this one:

 1.35.0-2       2026-05-24 17:16:38 UTC

 rasterio/amd64/1.5.0-2/1 gdal/3.13.0+...
 src:rasterio from unstable
 src:gdal from unstable

https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyresample/testing/amd64/

Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 PGP Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to