Your message dated Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:05:07 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#991640: fixed in openjfx 21.0.12+3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991640,
regarding openjfx: Cherry-pick patch to fix Hi-dpi scaling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
991640: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991640
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjfx
Version: 11.0.11+0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
I have a 4K Hi-dpi display, and when I set the display scaling to 200% in GNOME
Settings running on X11, a JavaFX application, MediathekView, does not respect
the 200% scaling and instead is not scaled at all.
I found this fixing commit upstream, which is part of version 11.0.11+1:
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-
jfx/commit/8508a767f9fa07e0ee3b76b00772688e67353db6
Please cherry-pick the fix to Debian Bullseye 11.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages openjfx depends on:
ii libopenjfx-java 11.0.11+0-1
Versions of packages openjfx recommends:
pn openjfx-source <none>
openjfx suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openjfx
Source-Version: 21.0.12+3-1
Done: Pierre Gruet <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openjfx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> (supplier of updated openjfx package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:43:43 +0200
Source: openjfx
Architecture: source
Version: 21.0.12+3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Pierre Gruet <[email protected]>
Closes: 910764 967672 991640 1041527 1117037
Changes:
openjfx (21.0.12+3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
* New upstream version 21.0.12+3
* Refreshing patches
* Setting the new path of src.zip in d/rules
* Honouring "parallel=" information rather than using nproc in d/rules,
correctly passing the number of processors to CMake (Closes: #1117037)
* Raising Standards version to 4.7.4:
- Removing Priority: optional, which is now defaults
* Having classifier-less artifacts point to the jars under /usr/share/java
* Patching build.gradle to build against gradle 4.4.1
* Skipping the attempt to build icu from embedded source
* Monitoring 21.* releases in d/watch
* Updating the list of files to remove when repacking
* Getting orig pom files for version 21
* Removing old Lintian override for source-is-missing because of very long
lines
* Fixing old FSF address in d/copyright
* Adding a Lintian override for embedded JS
* B-D on junit5 instead of junit4
* Dropping B-D on libgtk2.0-dev (Closes: #910764, #967672)
* Removing extra files from d/p/series
* Fixing type error in freetype.c
* Adding missing include of a template definition
* Resorting to old-fashioned pattern matching when using instanceof
* Removing old patterns from d/copyright
* Using javahelper to write the classpath of the built jars
* Revising the list of build-dependencies
* Switching to debhelper-compat 14, dropping shlibs and misc substvars
* Rely on pre-initialized dpkg-architecture variables.
.
[ Jeremy Bícha ]
* New upstream release 17.x (Closes: #1041527, #991640)
* Add minimal debian/gbp.conf
* Remove obsolete patches
Checksums-Sha1:
e7c32d03738ac2099fda864e49e26ce1c45727f0 2745 openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.dsc
9ff7408139da42b61f33864ec3509c45f3975569 32992376 openjfx_21.0.12+3.orig.tar.xz
7f62342173860c5fa5f84d581da9e1c8348731c0 27360
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.debian.tar.xz
658ed2b09e547d6f363381e7313f2e89e33b0ec4 19950
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
90bfee5f2f0d4e9eb339abb9742b0e3db32e44ac397c644a1778f97bbe9e74e1 2745
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.dsc
466ccdcc10450cb38060f5e7779c89ecc11648751dcdeecb2850bf7d301dca0a 32992376
openjfx_21.0.12+3.orig.tar.xz
4329e9907a75e00e79b563c78e7604d71af0a7e48d489195c469b8f1b1612b20 27360
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.debian.tar.xz
e1d6f5c43db93a29a245dbfe9ac1e33bf6e7ca462a5707041f45d5ad3c0aa716 19950
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
de77cecbd3fcbdb28faec1ea01655b90 2745 java optional openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.dsc
81cf6e6182fa9034ae10d4f11ca66991 32992376 java optional
openjfx_21.0.12+3.orig.tar.xz
55dbd823ad669960c0dd4569e98eb297 27360 java optional
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1.debian.tar.xz
76b07f003fdd8de390d2606aecf89544 19950 java optional
openjfx_21.0.12+3-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=+Gr5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpfuZHoVxZ2n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
