Your message dated Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:28:56 +0200
with message-id <[email protected];lightning.p46.dedyn.io>
and subject line Re: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1008802: chemps2: FTBFS on armel
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008802,
regarding chemps2: FTBFS on armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1008802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008802
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: chemps2
Version: 1.8.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
chemps2 FTBFS on armel:
cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/ && ctest -R "^test3|^test5|^test8"
Test project /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi
Start 3: test3
1/3 Test #3: test3 ............................***Exception: SegFault 14.74 sec
Start 5: test5
2/3 Test #5: test5 ............................ Passed 31.19 sec
Start 8: test8
3/3 Test #8: test8 ............................ Passed 15.10 sec
67% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 3
Total Test time (real) = 61.05 sec
The following tests FAILED:
3 - test3 (SEGFAULT)
Errors while running CTest
Output from these tests are in:
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=chemps2&arch=armel&ver=1.8.11-1%2Bb1&stamp=1648469570&raw=0
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 02:48:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 08:55:58PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > chemps2 FTBFS on armel:
[...]
> > 3 - test3 (SEGFAULT)
>
> It built for me on the porterbox abel (which is the same hardware as the
> buildds where it failed), and it also built on a buildd after a give-back.
>
> I am lowering the severity since there is no way to debug this problem
> when it is no longer reproducible.
I think we can close this as armel is no longer built and it seems to
build fine on all release architectures right now.
Michael
--- End Message ---
