Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:53:39 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1047395: fixed in sendip 2.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1047395,
regarding sendip: Fails to build source after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1047395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1047395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sendip
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
(dpkg-buildpackage ; dpkg-buildpackage -S).
This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9 (clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now, because a discussion on
debian-devel showed that we might want to revisit the requirement of a working
'clean' target.
More information about this class of issues, included common problems and
solutions, is available at
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS/SourceAfterBuild
Relevant part of the build log:
> cd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env
> -us -uc -rfakeroot -S
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package sendip
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 2.6-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Jonathan McDowell
> <[email protected]>
> dpkg-source --before-build .
> debian/rules clean
> dh clean
> dh_auto_clean
> make -j8 clean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> rm -f *.o *~ *.so ipv4.so ipv6.so icmp.so tcp.so udp.so rip.so ripng.so
> ntp.so bgp.so sendip core gmon.out
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_clean
> dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building sendip using existing ./sendip_2.6.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
> sendip-2.6/sendip.1
> sendip-2.6/sendip.spec
> dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see
> /tmp/sendip_2.6-1.diff.rcVTFI
> dpkg-source: info: Hint: make sure the version in debian/changelog matches
> the unpacked source tree
> dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source
> --commit
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2
>
> E: Command 'cd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage
> --sanitize-env -us -uc -rfakeroot -S' failed to run.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/08/13/sendip_2.6-1_unstable.log
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sendip
Source-Version: 2.6-1.1
Done: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sendip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <[email protected]> (supplier of updated sendip package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:10:53 +0200
Source: sendip
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonathan McDowell <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <[email protected]>
Closes: 1047395 1097871
Changes:
sendip (2.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Drop -Werror.
* Run make veryclean. (closes: #1047395)
.
[ Azeez Syed ]
* Fix FTBFS with GCC 15 / C23 (closes: #1097871):
- debian/patches/11-fix-ftbfs-gcc15-bool.patch: replace
'typedef int bool;' in types.h with '#include <stdbool.h>',
as recommended by the GCC 15 porting guide.
- debian/patches/12-fix-ftbfs-gcc15-old-style-defs.patch: convert
K&R-style definitions of exchange() and _getopt_initialize() in
gnugetopt.c to ANSI prototypes.
Checksums-Sha1:
784e6765082455b9da859817d3473c1ff40a250c 1654 sendip_2.6-1.1.dsc
a6e012a2e3f50a22ee05602f866f87163980fa08 7128 sendip_2.6-1.1.debian.tar.xz
ca411b01dc3b95c462ba24173fd87cb6b4c879b6 5147 sendip_2.6-1.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
4d4938e8e6cdb6eeb23b9eb5f9d39a25b98fa50db5c1ff284eeb2bbedc09d6cb 1654
sendip_2.6-1.1.dsc
9a8a0b49a0af65035789725dc330478a57f1ddda06dee06283bfa7042cd71603 7128
sendip_2.6-1.1.debian.tar.xz
24c1d9ed3111691e138e4efb4aeac800e2ac26f1da8f14cb394e47f3c850be01 5147
sendip_2.6-1.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
a9823f20055d2a924d19782245c1a3e3 1654 net optional sendip_2.6-1.1.dsc
ebec68851108d4caa116d77a2cf92590 7128 net optional sendip_2.6-1.1.debian.tar.xz
ccaa124d2fb5217a3fe23bc2c8c81276 5147 net optional
sendip_2.6-1.1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQHEBAEBCgAuFiEEQGIgyLhVKAI3jM5BH1x6i0VWQxQFAmrDsAAQHGJhZ2VAZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRAfXHqLRVZDFHwHC/9Pq+Gs9T0cJxueIlMKTPNjF3sHjqBRszg8
E3aWntaozSPT6pXafVPsOlFMJjPit1z0GvkV1Jbsrlr35vhk+c97fB12GdlFMRLK
uPxIXtJtvecHvMFO+YjZFf4tcdsqoL96Qaja5pi1rOmGwTdAnXFYenBPihyh3mQc
FXwTFoYlQukVzC+Nt5HbAXOIs/eeORsD76+381+JGO0ZI2uJRD1ZHQRRzKVTKuhV
t7glP3WJLi3Norr+2RFx5rDdn+cncUXzTAe6E85lElijvqGlIQMvAJovrdf3n9jJ
Dcqp9v1yeCa9ELgIAYx5MHcNR5kU1BOYoMc4hmTU6utYb5gvdzZxPvl9dRSnCkom
aSQBRwL3VwkhOC22OSpYfMGw1q0BfTSPRshtU1mTTR306AtsxNGQM82COpmpgLV5
75cLJHz9lh5NYxV2uBOk2DxU2ZscFqABbhefWl4lAzBs+Gbr0pSrgSgFHX9zKp1f
WHfVXYDh9SYpkB89OuzamsdpLaQ/PcM=
=Gadv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpslmWzEZYuF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
