Your message dated Mon, 5 Oct 2026 23:55:42 +0200
with message-id <asQc3i_E63twzN8W@seventeen>
and subject line Re: Bug#860648: gap-radiroot: FTBFS on i386: not enough memory
during build on i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #860648,
regarding gap-radiroot: FTBFS on i386: not enough memory during build on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
860648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gap-radiroot
Version: 2.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> mkdir -p debian/gaproot/pkg
> ln -s ../../.. debian/gaproot/pkg/RadiRoot
> gap -q -l 'debian/gaproot;/usr/share/gap' < tst/testall.g | tee debian/gap.tst
> true
> [ dir("debian/gaproot/pkg/RadiRoot/tst/") ]
> #I ReadTest is no longer supported. Please use more robust and flexible
> #I Test. For backwards compatibility, ReadTest(<filename>) is replaced
> #I by Test( <filename>, rec( compareFunction := "uptowhitespace" ))
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 1003520
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 1003520
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 64000000
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 32002048
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 16003072
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 8003584
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 4001792
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 2002944
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 1003520
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 503808
> *** Warning: not enough memory, new stack 500032
> *** at top-level: fac=lift(nffactor(f,pol))
> *** ^----------------
> *** nffactor: not enough memory
> *** at top-level: for(i=1,#fac[,1],for(j=1,fac[i,2
> *** ^--------------------
> *** incorrect type in _[,_] OCcompoC [not a matrix] (t_POL).
> ########> Diff in debian/gaproot/pkg/RadiRoot/tst/docexmpl.tst, line 6:
> # Input is:
> FactorsPolynomialAlgExt( L, f );
> # Expected output:
> [ x_1+(-3/94*a^4-24/47*a^3-253/94*a^2-535/94*a-168/47),
> x_1+(-3/94*a^4-24/47*a^3-253/94*a^2-441/94*a+20/47),
> x_1+(3/47*a^4+48/47*a^3+253/47*a^2+488/47*a+336/47) ]
> # But found:
> Error, List Element: <list>[1] must have an assigned value
> ########
> Test of documentation examples in package RadiRoot
> GAP4stones: 806
> #I ReadTest is no longer supported. Please use more robust and flexible
> #I Test. For backwards compatibility, ReadTest(<filename>) is replaced
> #I by Test( <filename>, rec( compareFunction := "uptowhitespace" ))
> Test handling of easy polynomials by RadiRoot
> GAP4stones: 3571
> ! grep "^########" debian/gap.tst
> ########> Diff in debian/gaproot/pkg/RadiRoot/tst/docexmpl.tst, line 6:
> ########
> debian/rules:6: recipe for target 'build-indep-stamp' failed
> make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/04/18/gap-radiroot_2.7-2_testing-i386.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 04:47:52PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 27/04/17 at 15:22 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:53:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > > Hello Lucas,
> > > > > Sorry for the delay, for some reason my ISP blocked this email.
> > > > > Do you know how much memory is there on this system ?
> > > > > The test suite need 128M which does not seems unreasonable.
> > > > >
> > > > > I did a test build using cowbuilder for stretch i386 and it worked
> > > > > fine.
> > > > > It seems to me your system was experiencing a memory crunch during the
> > > > > build.
> > > >
> > > > 256 GB of RAM on the amd64 host, of which only 4GB is available per
> > > > process since it's i386.
> > >
> > > How many threads
> > > getconf _NPROCESSORS_CONF
> > > report ?
> > >
> > > I think the problem is that it needs 128M by threads.
> >
> > 64, so yes, that's probably the issue
>
> There is only 64MB of virtual memory by threads.
> It is not a very realistic setup.
> No real i386 box is going to have some much threads.
Hello Lucas, I am closing this bug. No point keeping it open now.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[email protected]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--- End Message ---
