Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:34:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389674: ftp.debian.org: iptables has important priority
but is not a necessary tool
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: minor
iptables has important priority but is not a necessary tool, so its
priority should be lowered to either standard or optional. Its priority
was lowered from standard to important by James Troup in 2003 after a
suggestion by Dan
Jacobson to make iptables' priority match ipchains' (cf #206685), so one
should check why ipchains was priority important to verify if there was
ever a good reason for iptables to be priority important.
Considering #386363, I would recommend not to attempt getting input from
the maintainer about this.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10790 March 1977, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> iptables has important priority but is not a necessary tool, so its
> priority should be lowered to either standard or optional.
I disagree, *i* consider it important and do not see a reason to lower
its priority. Especially not as the maintainer is not supporting your view.
iptables, in my opinion, fits the description of priority important very
well, so unless you come up with a good reason why it doesnt fit this
wont happen.
> Considering #386363, I would recommend not to attempt getting input from
> the maintainer about this.
Considering #386363 you should be banned from control bot and the
maintainer at least get hit once too. Do not play the same game here
please.
--
bye Joerg
[Es geht um MySQL]
(14:35) <Lam_al_Adie> grummel. als ob ein subselect so kompliziert waere.
(14:35) <maxx> als ob mysql eine db wäre...
(14:35) <plaisthos> relationales textfile auf drogen? :0
pgp3SaGnizYMd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
